ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2014
Gene expression ratio test distinguishes normal lung from lung tumors in solid tissue and FNA biopsies.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A qualitative signature for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma based on relative expression orderings.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2018Article
- Robust transcriptional signatures for low-input RNA samples based on relative expression orderings.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Malignant pleural mesothelioma: predictors and staging.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Review
- Validation of a Gene Expression Test for Mesothelioma Prognosis in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Prognosis and survival are dependent on cell type, early detection, and surgical treatment. Hence, optimal screening strategies and new therapies are urgently required. Although surveillance with low-dose computed tomography can reduce lung cancer mortality by 20%, the number of false-positive detections is significant. Tissue diagnosis aids in the identification of benign nodules, reducing the number of false positive detections. To determine whether molecular testing of fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) can reduce false-positive detections, we developed a gene expression-based test that distinguishes normal from cancerous lung tissues. The test first was applied to published microarray data, showing overall sensitivity and specificity values of 95% (95% CI, 90%-98%) and 100% (95% CI, 40%-100%), respectively. Subsequently, it was validated on 30 solid and ex vivo FNA lung cancer tumor samples and matched normal lung specimens using real-time PCR. The validation test was 93% (95% CI, 78%-99%) sensitive and 100% (95% CI, 88%-100%) specific for the detection of tumor versus normal lung on solid samples, whereas FNA specimens yielded a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 72%-99%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 70%-100%). This study supports the hypothesis that the gene-ratio approach reliably distinguishes normal lung from cancerous tissues in FNA samples and can be optimized to diagnose benign nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.