ArticleTheoretical population biology2014
Theory and applications of a deterministic approximation to the coalescent model.
Article in Theoretical population biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating ARG-estimation methods in the context of estimating population-mean polygenic score histories.Genetics · 2025Article
- Evaluating ARG-estimation methods in the context of estimating population-mean polygenic score histories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Properties of 2-locus genealogies and linkage disequilibrium in temporally structured samples.Genetics · 2022Article
- Predicting the genomic resolution of bulk segregant analysis.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- An approximate full-likelihood method for inferring selection and allele frequency trajectories from DNA sequence data.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Article
- An efficient algorithm for generating the internal branches of a Kingman coalescent.Theoretical population biology · 2018Article
- Joint Estimation of Contamination, Error and Demography for Nuclear DNA from Ancient Humans.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Sampling through time and phylodynamic inference with coalescent and birth-death models.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Under the coalescent model, the random number nt of lineages ancestral to a sample is nearly deterministic as a function of time when nt is moderate to large in value, and it is well approximated by its expectation E[nt]. In turn, this expectation is well approximated by simple deterministic functions that are easy to compute. Such deterministic functions have been applied to estimate allele age, effective population size, and genetic diversity, and they have been used to study properties of models of infectious disease dynamics. Although a number of simple approximations of E[nt] have been derived and applied to problems of population-genetic inference, the theoretical accuracy of the resulting approximate formulas and the inferences obtained using these approximations is not known, and the range of problems to which they can be applied is not well understood. Here, we demonstrate general procedures by which the approximation nt≈E[nt] can be used to reduce the computational complexity of coalescent formulas, and we show that the resulting approximations converge to their true values under simple assumptions. Such approximations provide alternatives to exact formulas that are computationally intractable or numerically unstable when the number of sampled lineages is moderate or large. We also extend an existing class of approximations of E[nt] to the case of multiple populations of time-varying size with migration among them. Our results facilitate the use of the deterministic approximation nt≈E[nt] for deriving functionally simple, computationally efficient, and numerically stable approximations of coalescent formulas under complicated demographic scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.