Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24412209›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2014

Top-down response suppression mitigates action tendencies triggered by a motivating stimulus.

Scott M Freeman, Ieva Razhas, Adam R Aron

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The past, present, and future of selection history.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Influence of post-stroke fatigue on reaction times and corticospinal excitability during movement preparation.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Motor Cortex Excitability Reflects the Subjective Value of Reward and Mediates Its Effects on Incentive-Motivated Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Reward improves response inhibition by enhancing attentional capture.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott M FreemanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Ieva RazhasDepartment of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Adam R AronDepartment of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Electronic address: adamaron@ucsd.edu.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

How inhibitory control prevents thought intrusions and sensory and motor provocationsR01DA026452 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ARON, ADAM ROBERT · 2009 to 2021
$4.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DA026452NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivating stimuli provoke action tendencies that sometimes lead to unwanted behavior (e.g., eating chocolate when trying to diet). Implementing control over these provocations is essential to healthy functioning; however, few laboratory-based models of such control exist. Here we developed a novel task in which thirsty human subjects made instrumental responses to obtain a juice reward (Go trials) or were required to withhold responding (NoGo trials) in the presence of a rewarded (CS+) or unrewarded (CS-) conditioned stimulus. For Go trials, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed a rapid increase in motor activity for CS+ versus CS-, preceding more vigorous instrumental responding. Critically, successful NoGo trials resulted in suppression of motor activity for CS+, but not CS-. Moreover, while there was broad excitation in the hand muscles in Go trials, suppression in NoGo trials was selective to the effector that could obtain reward. These results show that response suppression can be triggered by a motivational stimulus, thus providing a richer model of self-control than classic cognitive psychology paradigms.

Indexed as

MotivationCognitionHandHumansReaction TimeReward

Identifiers

PMID24412209
PMCPMC4396623
OpenAlexW2084684905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.