Trial reportLeukemia research2014
Four different regimens of farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in older, untreated acute myeloid leukemia patients: North American Intergroup Phase II study SWOG S0432.
Trial report in Leukemia research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benchmarking treatment effects for patients over 70 with acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Tipifarnib as maintenance therapy did not improve disease-free survival in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia at high risk of relapse: Results of the phase III randomized E2902 trial.Leukemia research · 2021Trial
- The Role of the Bone Marrow Microenvironment in the Pathogenesis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Early mortality risk with non-intensive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapies: analysis of 1336 patients from MRC/NCRI and SWOG.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2023Article
- Advantages of multi-arm non-randomised sequentially allocated cohort designs for Phase II oncology trials.British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Mutation-Driven Therapy in MDS.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2019Review
- Article
- The role of cholesterol metabolism in leukemia.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2019Review
- Article
- Article
- Molecular therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We report on 348 patients ≥ 70 years (median age 78 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (>50% with secondary AML) randomized to receive either 600 mg or 300 mg of tipifarnib orally twice daily on days 1-21 or days 1-7 and 15-21, repeated every 28 days (4 treatment regimens). Responses were seen in all regimens, with overall response rate (CR + CRi + PR) highest (20%) among patients receiving tipifarnib 300 mg twice daily on days 1-21. Toxicities were acceptable. Unless predictors of response to tipifarnib are identified, further study as a single agent in this population is unwarranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.