Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24411715›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2014

Lupus nephritis: the evolving role of novel therapeutics.

Brad H Rovin, Samir V Parikh

Open access · greenAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Immunosuppressive treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Spatial proteomics landscape and immune signature analysis of renal sample of lupus nephritis based on laser-captured microsection.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brad H RovinDivision of Nephrology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: rovin.1@osu.edu.
Samir V ParikhDivision of Nephrology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001070 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2013 to 2017
$22.6M
The Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational Science (UL1)UL1TR000090 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2012 to 2013
$7.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000090NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000090NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune complex accumulation in the kidney is the hallmark of lupus nephritis and triggers a series of events that result in kidney inflammation and injury. Cytotoxic agents and corticosteroids are standard of care for lupus nephritis treatment, but are associated with considerable morbidity and suboptimal outcomes. Recently, there has been interest in using novel biologic agents and small molecules to treat lupus nephritis. These therapies can be broadly categorized as anti-inflammatory (laquinamod, anti-tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apotosis, anti-C5, and retinoids), antiautoimmunity (anti-CD20, anti-interferon α, and costimulatory blockers), or both (anti-interleukin 6 and proteasome inhibitors). Recent lupus nephritis clinical trials applied biologics or small molecules of any category to induction treatment, seeking short-term end points of complete renal response. These trials in general have not succeeded. When lupus nephritis comes to clinical attention during the inflammatory stage of the disease, the autoimmune stage leading to kidney inflammation will have been active for some time. The optimal approach for using novel therapies may be to initially target kidney inflammation to preserve renal parenchyma, followed by suppression of autoimmunity. In this review, we discuss novel lupus nephritis therapies and how they fit into a combinatorial treatment strategy based on the pathogenic stage.

Indexed as

AbataceptAcute Kidney InjuryAdolescentAlgorithmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedApoptosisAutoantibodiesB-LymphocytesCytokine TWEAKDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImmunoconjugatesImmunosuppressive AgentsAbataceptAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAutoantibodiesCytokine TWEAKeculizumabImmunoconjugatesImmunosuppressive AgentsInterleukin-6 InhibitorslaquinimodQuinolonesRituximabTNFSF12 protein, humanTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsbiologicsLupus nephritisnovel therapiessmall moleculessystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

Identifiers

PMID24411715
PMCPMC4159074
OpenAlexW1974553402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.