Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24411283›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2014

Prostate cancer (PCa) risk variants and risk of fatal PCa in the National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium.

Irene M Shui, Sara Lindström, Adam S Kibel, Sonja I Berndt, Daniele Campa, Travis Gerke, Kathryn L Penney, Demetrius Albanes, Christine Berg, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita and 25 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PCAT19: the role in cancer pathogenesis and beyond.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Associations between LncRNADiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Commercial Gene Expression Tests for Prostate Cancer Prognosis Provide Paradoxical Estimates of Race-Specific Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 16 institutions in 10 countries.

Irene M ShuiDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: ishui@hsph.harvard.edu.
Sara LindströmDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Adam S KibelDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sonja I BerndtDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Daniele CampaGenomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum), Heidelberg, Germany.
Travis GerkeDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Kathryn L PenneyDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Demetrius AlbanesDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christine BergDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
H Bas Bueno-de-MesquitaNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen ChanockDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA; Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
E David CrawfordUrologic Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
W Ryan DiverEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Susan M GapsturEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Michael GazianoDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Aging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Graham G GilesCancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Brian HendersonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Robert HooverDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mattias JohanssonInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; Department of Biobank Research, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Loic Le MarchandEpidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Jing MaDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Carmen NavarroDepartment of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Authority, Murcia, Spain; Department of Health and Social Sciences, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Kim OvervadDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Fredrick R SchumacherDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gianluca SeveriCancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia; HuGeF Foundation, Torino, Italy.
Afshan SiddiqDepartment of Genomics of Common Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Meir StampferDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Victoria L StevensEpidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ruth C TravisCancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dimitrios TrichopoulosDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Bureau of Epidemiologic Research, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece; Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Paolo VineisHuGeF Foundation, Torino, Italy; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lorelei A MucciDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Meredith YeagerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA; Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Edward GiovannucciDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter KraftDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USAmerican Cancer Society · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsImperial College London · GBCancer Council Victoria · AUNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Southern California · USAarhus University · DKCancer Center of Hawaii · USCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRGerman Cancer Research Center · DEJohns Hopkins University · USUniversidad de Murcia · ESUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Training Program in Cancer EpidemiologyT32CA009001 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI A. Heather Eliassen, Meir Stampfer · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
Epidemiological and Clinical Translational Studies Post Genome-Wide AssociationU19CA148537 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EASTON, DOUGLAS FREDERICK, EELES, ROSALIND · 2010 to 2014
$10.4M
Characterizing Genetic Susceptibility to Breast and Prostate Cancer: The BPC3.U01CA098710 · NCI · AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, INC. · PI GAPSTUR, SUSAN M · 2003 to 2011
$4.2M
Cancer Research UK 16491Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS 5U01CA098710NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009001NCI NIH HHS T32 CA09001NCI NIH HHS U01 CA098710NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148537NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148537-01World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening and diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is hampered by an inability to predict who has the potential to develop fatal disease and who has indolent cancer. Studies have identified multiple genetic risk loci for PCa incidence, but it is unknown whether they could be used as biomarkers for PCa-specific mortality (PCSM).

objectiveTo examine the association of 47 established PCa risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with PCSM. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe included 10 487 men who had PCa and 11 024 controls, with a median follow-up of 8.3 yr, during which 1053 PCa deaths occurred. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The main outcome was PCSM. The risk allele was defined as the allele associated with an increased risk for PCa in the literature. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate the hazard ratios of each SNP with time to progression to PCSM after diagnosis. We also used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios for each risk SNP, comparing fatal PCa cases to controls. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Among the cases, we found that 8 of the 47 SNPs were significantly associated (p<0.05) with time to PCSM. The risk allele of rs11672691 (intergenic) was associated with an increased risk for PCSM, while 7 SNPs had risk alleles inversely associated (rs13385191 [C2orf43], rs17021918 [PDLIM5], rs10486567 [JAZF1], rs6465657 [LMTK2], rs7127900 (intergenic), rs2735839 [KLK3], rs10993994 [MSMB], rs13385191 [C2orf43]). In the case-control analysis, 22 SNPs were associated (p<0.05) with the risk of fatal PCa, but most did not differentiate between fatal and nonfatal PCa. Rs11672691 and rs10993994 were associated with both fatal and nonfatal PCa, while rs6465657, rs7127900, rs2735839, and rs13385191 were associated with nonfatal PCa only.

conclusionsEight established risk loci were associated with progression to PCSM after diagnosis. Twenty-two SNPs were associated with fatal PCa incidence, but most did not differentiate between fatal and nonfatal PCa. The relatively small magnitudes of the associations do not translate well into risk prediction, but these findings merit further follow-up, because they may yield important clues about the complex biology of fatal PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we assessed whether established PCa risk variants could predict PCSM. We found eight risk variants associated with PCSM: One predicted an increased risk of PCSM, while seven were associated with decreased risk. Larger studies that focus on fatal PCa are needed to identify more markers that could aid prediction.

Indexed as

AgedAllelesAustraliaBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesEuropeGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProportional Hazards ModelsProstatic NeoplasmsRegistriesRisk AssessmentUnited StatesBiomarkers, TumorGenetic epidemiologyProstate cancerProstate cancer mortalityRisk single nucleotide polymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID24411283
PMCPMC4006298
OpenAlexW2102425090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.