Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24411238›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

Border forces and friction control epithelial closure dynamics.

Olivier Cochet-Escartin, Jonas Ranft, Pascal Silberzan, Philippe Marcq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Physical models of embryonic epithelial healing.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Actin Stress Fibers Response and Adaptation under Stretch.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Collective durotaxis of cohesive cell clusters on a stiffness gradient.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2022
    Article
  13. Tissue Engineering with Mechanically Induced Solid-Fluid Transitions.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reversible elastic phase field approach and application to cell monolayers.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivier Cochet-EscartinPhysico-Chimie Curie, Unité Mixte de Recherche 168, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Jonas RanftPhysico-Chimie Curie, Unité Mixte de Recherche 168, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Pascal SilberzanPhysico-Chimie Curie, Unité Mixte de Recherche 168, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Electronic address: pascal.silberzan@curie.fr.
Philippe MarcqPhysico-Chimie Curie, Unité Mixte de Recherche 168, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Electronic address: philippe.marcq@curie.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study the closure dynamics of a large number of well-controlled circular apertures within an epithelial monolayer, where the collective cell migration responsible for epithelization is triggered by the removal of a spatial constraint rather than by scratching. Based on experimental observations, we propose a physical model that takes into account border forces, friction with the substrate, and tissue rheology. Border protrusive activity drives epithelization despite the presence of a contractile actomyosin cable at the periphery of the wound. The closure dynamics is quantified by an epithelization coefficient, defined as the ratio of protrusive stress to tissue-substrate friction, that allows classification of different phenotypes. The same analysis demonstrates a distinct signature for human cells bearing the oncogenic RasV12 mutation, demonstrating the potential of the approach to quantitatively characterize metastatic transformations.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalRe-EpithelializationActomyosinAnimalsCell MovementDogsEpithelial CellsFrictionHEK293 CellsHumansMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsPhenotypeRheologyActomyosin

Identifiers

PMID24411238
PMCPMC3907253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.