Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24411236›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

Direct measurement of helical cell motion of the spirochete leptospira.

Shuichi Nakamura, Alexander Leshansky, Yukio Magariyama, Keiichi Namba, Seishi Kudo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Measurement of the Cell-Body Rotation of Leptospira.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. In Situ Structural Analysis of Leptospira spp. by Electron Cryotomography.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of Adhesion and Surface Motility of a Spirochete Bacterium.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Motility of the Zoonotic SpirocheteInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuichi NakamuraDepartment of Applied Physics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan. Electronic address: naka@bp.apph.tohoku.ac.jp.
Alexander LeshanskyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Yukio MagariyamaNational Food Research Institute, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Ibaraki, Japan.
Keiichi NambaGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan; Quantitative Biology Center, RIKEN, Osaka, Japan.
Seishi KudoDepartment of Applied Physics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan. Electronic address: kudo@m.tohoku.ac.jp.
Tohoku University · JPNational Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILUbe Frontier University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leptospira are spirochete bacteria distinguished by a short-pitch coiled body and intracellular flagella. Leptospira cells swim in liquid with an asymmetric morphology of the cell body; the anterior end has a long-pitch spiral shape (S-end) and the posterior end is hook-shaped (H-end). Although the S-end and the coiled cell body called the protoplasmic cylinder are thought to be responsible for propulsion together, most observations on the motion mechanism have remained qualitative. In this study, we analyzed the swimming speed and rotation rate of the S-end, protoplasmic cylinder, and H-end of individual Leptospira cells by one-sided dark-field microscopy. At various viscosities of media containing different concentrations of Ficoll, the rotation rate of the S-end and protoplasmic cylinder showed a clear correlation with the swimming speed, suggesting that these two helical parts play a central role in the motion of Leptospira. In contrast, the H-end rotation rate was unstable and showed much less correlation with the swimming speed. Forces produced by the rotation of the S-end and protoplasmic cylinder showed that these two helical parts contribute to propulsion at nearly equal magnitude. Torque generated by each part, also obtained from experimental motion parameters, indicated that the flagellar motor can generate torque >4000 pN nm, twice as large as that of Escherichia coli. Furthermore, the S-end torque was found to show a markedly larger fluctuation than the protoplasmic cylinder torque, suggesting that the unstable H-end rotation might be mechanically related to changes in the S-end rotation rate for torque balance of the entire cell. Variations in torque at the anterior and posterior ends of the Leptospira cell body could be transmitted from one end to the other through the cell body to coordinate the morphological transformations of the two ends for a rapid change in the swimming direction.

Indexed as

MotionLeptospiraMovementTorqueViscosity

Identifiers

PMID24411236
PMCPMC3907252
OpenAlexW1988977441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.