ArticleInternational journal of cardiology2014
Clinical research priorities in adult congenital heart disease.
Article in International journal of cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence-based Management of Heart Failure in the Systemic Right Ventricle.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Impact of pulmonary valve replacement on left and right ventricular function using strain analysis, in children with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Research priorities in children and adults with congenital heart disease: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.Open heart · 2022Article
- Operational and Ethical Considerations for a National Adult Congenital Heart Disease Database.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Cardiac MRI predictors of adverse outcomes in adults with a systemic right ventricle.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Research priorities in single-ventricle heart conditions: a United Kingdom national study.Cardiology in the young · 2019Article
- Design and Implementation of a Prospective Adult Congenital Heart Disease Biobank.World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery · 2016Article
- Transition from paediatric to adult care of adolescent patients with congenital heart disease: a pathway to optimal care.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2016Article
- Ventricular-Arterial Function and Coupling in the Adult Fontan Circulation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Article
- Emerging Research Directions in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Report From an NHLBI/ACHA Working Group.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdult congenital heart disease (ACHD) clinicians are hampered by the paucity of data to inform clinical decision-making. The objective of this study was to identify priorities for clinical research in ACHD.
methodsA list of 45 research questions was developed by the Alliance for Adult Research in Congenital Cardiology (AARCC), compiled into a survey, and administered to ACHD providers. Patient input was sought via the Adult Congenital Heart Association at community meetings and online forums. The 25 top questions were sent to ACHD providers worldwide via an online survey. Each question was ranked based on perceived priority and weighted based on time spent in ACHD care. The top 10 topics identified are presented and discussed.
resultsThe final online survey yielded 139 responses. Top priority questions related to tetralogy of Fallot (timing of pulmonary valve replacement and criteria for primary prevention ICDs), patients with systemic right ventricles (determining the optimal echocardiographic techniques for measuring right ventricular function, and indications for tricuspid valve replacement and primary prevention ICDs), and single ventricle/Fontan patients (role of pulmonary vasodilators, optimal anticoagulation, medical therapy for preservation of ventricular function, treatment for protein losing enteropathy). In addition, establishing criteria to refer ACHD patients for cardiac transplantation was deemed a priority.
conclusionsThe ACHD field is in need of prospective research to address fundamental clinical questions. It is hoped that this methodical consultation process will inform researchers and funding organizations about clinical research topics deemed to be of high priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.