Trial reportLipids in health and disease2014
Atorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe versus titration to atorvastatin 40 mg: attainment of European and Canadian guideline lipid targets in high-risk subjects ≥65 years.
Trial report in Lipids in health and disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00418834 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Arm, 12-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe 10 mg When Added to Atorvastatin 10 mg Versus Titration to Atorvastatin 20 mg and to 40 mg in Elderly Patients With Hypercholesterolemia at High Risk for CHD), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Arm, 12-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe 10 mg When Added to Atorvastatin 10 mg Versus Titration to Atorvastatin 20 mg and to 40 mg in Elderly Patients With Hypercholesterolemia at High Risk for CHD
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Statin Therapy in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Dosing, Titration, and Combination Strategies.GeroScience · 2026Pooled it
- Estimate of Brazilians Under Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events Who Do Not Achieve LDL Cholesterol Targets with Lipid-Lowering Therapy.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Drug Therapy of Dyslipidemia in the Elderly.Drugs & aging · 2019Review
- Prompt impact of first prospective statin mega-trials on postoperative lipid management of CABG patients: a 20-year follow-up in a single hospital.Lipids in health and disease · 2016Article
- Genetic susceptibility to dyslipidemia and incidence of cardiovascular disease depending on a diet quality index in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort.Genes & nutrition · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew clinical studies have focused on the efficacy of lipid-lowering therapies in patients ≥65 years.
methodsAfter stabilization on atorvastatin 10 mg, hypercholesterolemic subjects ≥65 years at high/very high risk for CHD and not at LDL-C <1.81 mmol/L (with atherosclerotic vascular disease [AVD]) or <2.59 mmol/L (without AVD) were randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg plus atorvastatin 10 mg or uptitration to atorvastatin 20 mg (6 weeks) followed by uptitration to 40 mg (additional 6 weeks). A post-hoc analysis compared between-group differences in percent attainment of individual and combined LDL-C, non-HDL-C and Apo B targets based on recommendations from 2012 European and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines for dyslipidemia treatment.
resultsAtorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe produced significantly greater attainment of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and Apo B individual and dual/triple targets vs. atorvastatin 20 mg for the entire cohort and very high-risk groups at 6 weeks. After 12 weeks, very high-risk subjects maintained significantly greater achievement of LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L (47% vs. 35%), non-HDL-C <2.6 mmol/L (63% vs. 53%) and Apo B <0.8 g/L (47% vs. 38%) single targets and dual/triple targets with atorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe vs. atorvastatin 40 mg, while attainment of European target for high-risk subjects was generally similar for both treatments. Achievement of Canadian targets was significantly greater with combination therapy vs. atorvastatin 20 mg (6 weeks) or atorvastatin 40 mg (12 weeks).
conclusionsAtorvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe provided more effective treatment than uptitration to atorvastatin 20/40 mg for attainment of most European and Canadian guideline-recommended lipid targets in older at-risk patients.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00418834.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.