ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
Toward an accurate prediction of inter-residue distances in proteins using 2D recursive neural networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure Modeling Protocols for Protein Multimer and RNA in CASP16 With Enhanced MSAs, Model Ranking, and Deep Learning.Proteins · 2026Article
- Article
- Contact-Assisted Threading in Low-Homology Protein Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein variants through graph embedding.Network modeling and analysis in health informatics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Ultrafast end-to-end protein structure prediction enables high-throughput exploration of uncharacterized proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Enhancing protein inter-residue real distance prediction by scrutinising deep learning models.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Inter-Residue Distance Prediction From Duet Deep Learning Models.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A fully open-source framework for deep learning protein real-valued distances.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Deep learning methods in protein structure prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Distance-based protein folding powered by deep learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Article
- DeepCDpred: Inter-residue distance and contact prediction for improved prediction of protein structure.PloS one · 2019Article
- Forecasting residue-residue contact prediction accuracy.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Improving homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors through multiple-template derived conserved inter-residue interactions.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtein inter-residue contact maps provide a translation and rotation invariant topological representation of a protein. They can be used as an intermediary step in protein structure predictions. However, the prediction of contact maps represents an unbalanced problem as far fewer examples of contacts than non-contacts exist in a protein structure.In this study we explore the possibility of completely eliminating the unbalanced nature of the contact map prediction problem by predicting real-value distances between residues. Predicting full inter-residue distance maps and applying them in protein structure predictions has been relatively unexplored in the past.
resultsWe initially demonstrate that the use of native-like distance maps is able to reproduce 3D structures almost identical to the targets, giving an average RMSD of 0.5Å. In addition, the corrupted physical maps with an introduced random error of ±6Å are able to reconstruct the targets within an average RMSD of 2Å.After demonstrating the reconstruction potential of distance maps, we develop two classes of predictors using two-dimensional recursive neural networks: an ab initio predictor that relies only on the protein sequence and evolutionary information, and a template-based predictor in which additional structural homology information is provided. We find that the ab initio predictor is able to reproduce distances with an RMSD of 6Å, regardless of the evolutionary content provided. Furthermore, we show that the template-based predictor exploits both sequence and structure information even in cases of dubious homology and outperforms the best template hit with a clear margin of up to 3.7Å.Lastly, we demonstrate the ability of the two predictors to reconstruct the CASP9 targets shorter than 200 residues producing the results similar to the state of the machine learning art approach implemented in the Distill server.
conclusionsThe methodology presented here, if complemented by more complex reconstruction protocols, can represent a possible path to improve machine learning algorithms for 3D protein structure prediction. Moreover, it can be used as an intermediary step in protein structure predictions either on its own or complemented by NMR restraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.