Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24410739›Full record

Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2014

Change in prostate volume during extreme hypo-fractionation analysed with MRI.

Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Elisabeth Kjellén, Oskar Hagberg, Camilla Thellenberg-Karlsson, Anders Widmark, Per Nilsson

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Practice-based training strategy for therapist-driven prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adalsteinn GunnlaugssonDepartment of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, 22185 Lund, Sweden. adalsteinn.gunnlaugsson@skane.se.
Elisabeth Kjellén
Oskar Hagberg
Camilla Thellenberg-Karlsson
Anders Widmark
Per Nilsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypo-fractionated external beam radiotherapy with narrow CTV-PTV margins is increasingly applied for prostate cancer. This demands a precise target definition and knowledge on target location and extension during treatment. It is unclear how increase in fraction size affects changes in prostate volume during treatment. Our aim was to study prostate volume changes during extreme hypo-fractionation (7 × 6.1 Gy) by using sequential MRIs.

methodsTwenty patients treated with extreme hypo-fractionation were recruited from an on-going prospective randomized phase III trial. An MRI scan was done before start of treatment, at mid treatment and at the end of radiotherapy. The prostate was delineated at each MRI and the volume and maximum extension in left-right, anterior-posterior and cranial-caudal directions were measured.

resultsThere was a significant increase in mean prostate volume (14%) at mid treatment as compared to baseline. The prostate volume remained enlarged (9%) at the end of radiotherapy. Prostate swelling was most pronounced in the anterior-posterior and cranial-caudal directions.

conclusionsExtreme hypo-fractionation induced a significant prostate swelling during treatment that was still present at the time of last treatment fraction. Our results indicate that prostate swelling is an important factor to take into account when applying treatment margins during short extreme hypo-fractionation, and that tight margins should be applied with caution.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdenocarcinomaAgedBrachytherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizePrognosisProstateProstatic NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID24410739
PMCPMC3901329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.