Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24410463›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2014

Mesenchymal stem cells: roles and relationships in vascularization.

Anthony J Melchiorri, Bao-Ngoc B Nguyen, John P Fisher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioengineering in salivary gland regeneration.Journal of biomedical science · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. [Research progress of tissue engineering technology in promoting revascularization of necrotic femoral bone tissue].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthony J MelchiorriFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland , College Park, Maryland.
Bao-Ngoc B Nguyen
John P Fisher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the primary challenges in translating tissue engineering to clinical applicability is adequate, functional vascularization of tissue constructs. Vascularization is necessary for the long-term viability of implanted tissue expanded and differentiated in vitro. Such tissues may be derived from various cell sources, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). MSCs, able to differentiate down several lineages, have been extensively researched for their therapeutic capabilities. In addition, MSCs have a variety of roles in the vascularization of tissue, both through direct contact and indirect signaling. The studied relationships between MSCs and vascularization have been utilized to further the necessary advancement of vascularization in tissue engineering concepts. This review aims to provide a summary of relevant relationships between MSCs, vascularization, and other relevant cell types, along with an overview discussing applications and challenges related to the roles and relationships of MSCs and vascular tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsBatch Cell Culture TechniquesBlood VesselsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationNeovascularization, PhysiologicProsthesis DesignTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID24410463
PMCPMC4030653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.