Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24410342›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2014

Mimicking isovolumic contraction with combined electromechanical stimulation improves the development of engineered cardiac constructs.

Kathy Ye Morgan, Lauren Deems Black

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Short-Term Electrical Stimulation Impacts Cardiac Cell Structure and Function.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathy Ye Morgan1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University , Medford, Massachusetts.
Lauren Deems Black
Tufts University · US

Funding

Restoring LV Function Post-MI Using Fibrin-Gel Based Engineered MyocardiumR00HL093358 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI BLACK III, LAUREN D. · 2010 to 2012
$747k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00HL093358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical and mechanical stimulation have both been used extensively to improve the function of cardiac engineered tissue as each of these stimuli is present in the physical environment during normal development in vivo. However, to date, there has been no direct comparison between electrical and mechanical stimulation and current published data are difficult to compare due to the different systems used to create the engineered cardiac tissue and the different measures of functionality studied as outcomes. The goals of this study were twofold. First, we sought to directly compare the effects of mechanical and electrical stimulation on engineered cardiac tissue. Second, we aimed to determine the importance of the timing of the two stimuli in relation to each other in combined electromechanical stimulation. We hypothesized that delaying electrical stimulation after the beginning of mechanical stimulation to mimic the biophysical environment present during isovolumic contraction would improve construct function by improving proteins responsible for cell-cell communication and contractility. To test this hypothesis, we created a bioreactor system that would allow us to electromechanically stimulate engineered tissue created from neonatal rat cardiac cells entrapped in fibrin gel during 2 weeks in culture. Contraction force was higher for all stimulation groups as compared with the static controls, with the delayed combined stimulation constructs having the highest forces. Mechanical stimulation alone displayed increased final cell numbers but there were no other differences between electrical and mechanical stimulation alone. Delayed combined stimulation resulted in an increase in SERCA2a and troponin T expression levels, which did not happen with synchronous combined stimulation, indicating that the timing of combined stimulation is important to maximize the beneficial effect. Increases in Akt protein expression levels suggest that the improvements are at least in part induced by hypertrophic growth. In summary, combined electromechanical stimulation can create engineered cardiac tissue with improved functional properties over electrical or mechanical stimulation alone, and the timing of the combined stimulation greatly influences its effects on engineered cardiac tissue.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell CommunicationCell CountCells, CulturedContractile ProteinsElectric StimulationHeartImmunohistochemistryMyocardial ContractionRats, Sprague-DawleySignal TransductionTissue ScaffoldsContractile Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24410342
PMCPMC4029049
OpenAlexW2335759569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.