Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24409302›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Visualizing cell state transition using Raman spectroscopy.

Taro Ichimura, Liang-da Chiu, Katsumasa Fujita, Satoshi Kawata, Tomonobu M Watanabe, Toshio Yanagida, Hideaki Fujita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Live-cell omics with Raman spectroscopy.Microscopy (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Review
  7. Noninvasive andThe Analyst · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Raman Spectroscopy for Chemical Biology Research.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taro IchimuraQuantitative Biology Center, Riken, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Liang-da ChiuDepartment of Applied Physics, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Katsumasa FujitaDepartment of Applied Physics, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi KawataDepartment of Applied Physics, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Nanophotonics Laboratory, Riken, Wako, Saitama, Japan.
Tomonobu M WatanabeQuantitative Biology Center, Riken, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Toshio YanagidaQuantitative Biology Center, Riken, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hideaki FujitaQuantitative Biology Center, Riken, Suita, Osaka, Japan ; Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

System level understanding of the cell requires detailed description of the cell state, which is often characterized by the expression levels of proteins. However, understanding the cell state requires comprehensive information of the cell, which is usually obtained from a large number of cells and their disruption. In this study, we used Raman spectroscopy, which can report changes in the cell state without introducing any label, as a non-invasive method with single cell capability. Significant differences in Raman spectra were observed at the levels of both the cytosol and nucleus in different cell-lines from mouse, indicating that Raman spectra reflect differences in the cell state. Difference in cell state was observed before and after the induction of differentiation in neuroblastoma and adipocytes, showing that Raman spectra can detect subtle changes in the cell state. Cell state transitions during embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation were visualized when Raman spectroscopy was coupled with principal component analysis (PCA), which showed gradual transition in the cell states during differentiation. Detailed analysis showed that the diversity between cells are large in undifferentiated ESC and in mesenchymal stem cells compared with terminally differentiated cells, implying that the cell state in stem cells stochastically fluctuates during the self-renewal process. The present study strongly indicates that Raman spectral morphology, in combination with PCA, can be used to establish cells' fingerprints, which can be useful for distinguishing and identifying different cellular states.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineEmbryonic Stem CellsMiceSpectrum Analysis, Raman

Identifiers

PMID24409302
PMCPMC3883674
OpenAlexW2042704577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.