Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24409281›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

An inflammation based score can optimize the selection of patients with advanced cancer considered for early phase clinical trials.

David J Pinato, Chara Stavraka, Michael J Flynn, Martin D Forster, Séan M O'Cathail, Michael J Seckl, Rebecca S Kristeleit, David Olmos, Samantha J Turnbull, Sarah P Blagden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Principal Investigators' Perceptions on Factors Associated with Successful Recruitment in Clinical Trials.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Challenges Facing Early Phase Trials Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute: An Analysis of Corrective Action Plans to Improve Accrual.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David J PinatoWellcome Trust McMichael Clinical Research Facility, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Chara StavrakaWellcome Trust McMichael Clinical Research Facility, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Michael J FlynnUniversity College London Clinical Research Facility, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Martin D ForsterUniversity College London Clinical Research Facility, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Séan M O'CathailDepartment of Oncology, Imperial College London. Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Michael J SecklDepartment of Oncology, Imperial College London. Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca S KristeleitUniversity College London Clinical Research Facility, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
David OlmosRoyal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom.
Samantha J TurnbullUniversity College London Clinical Research Facility, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah P BlagdenUniversity College London Clinical Research Facility, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBImperial College London · GBWellcome Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate organ function and good performance status (PS) are common eligibility criteria for phase I trials. As inflammation is pathogenic and prognostic in cancer we investigated the prognostic performance of inflammation-based indices including the neutrophil (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR).

methodsWe studied inflammatory scores in 118 unselected referrals. NLR normalization was recalculated at disease reassessment. Each variable was assessed for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on uni- and multivariate analyses and tested for 90 days survival (90DS) prediction using receiving operator curves (ROC).

resultsWe included 118 patients with median OS 4.4 months, 23% PS>1. LDH≥450 and NLR≥5 were multivariate predictors of OS (p<0.001). NLR normalization predicted for longer OS (p<0.001) and PFS (p<0.05). PS and NLR ranked as most accurate predictors of both 90DS with area under ROC values of 0.66 and 0.64, and OS with c-score of 0.69 and 0.60. The combination of NLR+PS increased prognostic accuracy to 0.72. The NLR was externally validated in a cohort of 126 subjects.

conclusionsWe identified the NLR as a validated and objective index to improve patient selection for experimental therapies, with its normalization following treatment predicting for a survival benefit of 7 months. Prospective validation of the NLR is warranted.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAgedAged, 80 and overBlood PlateletsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInflammationLeukocyte CountLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingNeutrophils

Identifiers

PMID24409281
PMCPMC3883636
OpenAlexW2015563029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.