ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2014
The efficacy and safety of daclizumab and its potential role in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.
Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Disease-Modifying Drugs on Brain Atrophy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Repopulation of T, B, and NK cells following alemtuzumab treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2020Trial
- Pyoderma gangrenosum in a patient with multiple sclerosis under natalizumab treatment: a case report.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Engineering antigen-presenting cells for immunotherapy of autoimmunity.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024Review
- Review
- Immunomodulation in Administration of rAAV: Preclinical and Clinical Adjuvant Pharmacotherapies.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Review
- Regulatory T Cells As Potential Targets for HIV Cure Research.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- The sequence of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: safety and immunologic considerations.Journal of neurology · 2017Review
- Daclizumab.Hospital pharmacy · 2016Article
- Population PK-PD analyses of CD25 occupancy, CD56British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
- Alemtuzumab long-term immunologic effect: Treg suppressor function increases up to 24 months.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2016Article
- Vasomotor reactivity comparison in multiple sclerosis patients with white matter lesions and nonmultiple sclerosis subjects with white matter lesions in brain magnetic resonance imaging.Advanced biomedical research · 2016Article
- Spotlight on daclizumab: its potential in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease · 2016Review
- Neuroimmunotherapies Targeting T Cells: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Applications.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2016Review
- Emerging immunopharmacological targets in multiple sclerosis.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2015Review
- Monoclonal antibody therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: differentiating mechanisms and clinical outcomes.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2015Review
- Immunological mechanism of action and clinical profile of disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis.CNS drugs · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Daclizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody of the immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) isotype that binds to the α-subunit (CD25) of the high-affinity interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor expressed on activated T cells and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells. Based on the assumption that it would block the activation and expansion of autoreactive T cells that are central to the immune pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS), daclizumab was tested in several small open-label clinical trials in MS and demonstrated a profound inhibition of inflammatory disease activity. Surprisingly, accompanying mechanistic studies revealed that the most important biological effect of daclizumab was rather a dramatic expansion and activation of immunoregulatory CD56(bright) natural-killer (NK) cells that correlated with treatment response, while there was no or only minor effect on peripheral T-cell activation and function. These CD56(bright) NK cells were able to gain access to the central nervous system in MS and kill autologous activated T cells. Additional and relatively large phase IIb clinical trials showed that daclizumab, as add-on or monotherapy in relapsing-remitting (RR) MS, was highly effective in reducing relapse rate, disability progression, and the number and volume of gadolinium-enhancing, T1 and T2 lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and reproduced the expansion of CD56(bright) NK cells as a biomarker for daclizumab activity. Daclizumab is generally very well tolerated and has shown a favorable adverse event (AE) profile in transplant recipients. However, several potentially serious and newly emerging AEs (mainly infections, skin reactions, elevated liver function tests and autoimmune phenomena in several body organs) may require strict safety monitoring programs in future clinical practice and place daclizumab together with other new and highly effective MS drugs as a second-line therapy. Ongoing phase III clinical trials in RRMS are expected to provide definite information on the efficacy and safety of daclizumab and to determine its place in the fast-growing armamentarium of MS therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.