ArticlePLoS biology2014
Open science and reporting animal studies: who's accountable?
Article in PLoS biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Recovering from depression with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies.Translational psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A combined pre-clinical meta-analysis and randomized confirmatory trial approach to improve data validity for therapeutic target validation.Scientific reports · 2015Pooled it
- Quality of Animal Experiments in Anti-Angiogenic Cancer Drug Development--A Systematic Review.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Scalable Measurements of Intrinsic Excitability in Human iPS Cell-Derived Excitatory Neurons Using All-Optical Electrophysiology.Neurochemical research · 2019Article
- Good Science, Good Sense and Good Sensibilities: The Three Ss of Carol Newton.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2016Article
- Optimized design and analysis of preclinical intervention studies in vivo.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Pain and Laboratory Animals: Publication Practices for Better Data Reproducibility and Better Animal Welfare.PloS one · 2016Article
- A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals' Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2015Article
- Beyond bar and line graphs: time for a new data presentation paradigm.PLoS biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.