Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24408965›Full record

ReviewEMBO molecular medicine2014

mRNA 3'end processing: A tale of the tail reaches the clinic.

Ina Hollerer, Kerstin Grund, Matthias W Hentze, Andreas E Kulozik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO molecular medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Menin in Cancer.Genes · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Targeting mRNA processing as an anticancer strategy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2020
    Review
  13. Gene Alterations of N6-Methyladenosine (mBioMed research international · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ina HollererDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kerstin Grund
Matthias W Hentze
Andreas E Kulozik

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances reveal mRNA 3'end processing as a highly regulated process that fine-tunes posttranscriptional gene expression. This process can affect the site and/or the efficiency of 3'end processing, controlling the quality and the quantity of substrate mRNAs. The regulation of 3'end processing plays a central role in fundamental physiology such as blood coagulation and innate immunity. In addition, errors in mRNA 3'end processing have been associated with a broad spectrum of human diseases, including cancer. We summarize and discuss the paradigmatic shift in the understanding of 3'end processing as a mechanism of posttranscriptional gene regulation that has reached clinical medicine.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsHematologic DiseasesHumansmRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation FactorsNeoplasmsNeurodegenerative DiseasesPoly(A)-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional3' Untranslated RegionsmRNA Cleavage and Polyadenylation FactorsPoly(A)-Binding ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24408965
PMCPMC3936486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.