ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014
Ancestral resurrection of the Drosophila S2E enhancer reveals accessible evolutionary paths through compensatory change.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing the regulatory logic of transcriptional control at the DNA sequence level by ensembles of thermodynamic models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Genomic Analysis of Indel and SV Reveals Functional and Adaptive Signatures in Hubei Indigenous Cattle Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Fully interpretable deep learning model of transcriptional control.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- An in silico analysis of robust but fragile gene regulation links enhancer length to robustness.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- In silico evolution of the Drosophila gap gene regulatory sequence under elevated mutational pressure.BMC evolutionary biology · 2017Article
- A sequence level model of an intact locus predicts the location and function of nonadditive enhancers.PloS one · 2017Article
- Translating natural genetic variation to gene expression in a computational model of the Drosophila gap gene regulatory network.PloS one · 2017Article
- Resurrecting ancestral structural dynamics of an antiviral immune receptor: adaptive binding pocket reorganization repeatedly shifts RNA preference.BMC evolutionary biology · 2016Article
- Natural variation of the expression pattern of the segmentation gene even-skipped in melanogaster.Developmental biology · 2015Article
- Analysis of functional importance of binding sites in the Drosophila gap gene network model.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Molecular dissection of the genetic mechanisms that underlie expression conservation in orthologous yeast ribosomal promoters.Genome research · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Upstream regulatory sequences that control gene expression evolve rapidly, yet the expression patterns and functions of most genes are typically conserved. To address this paradox, we have reconstructed computationally and resurrected in vivo the cis-regulatory regions of the ancestral Drosophila eve stripe 2 element and evaluated its evolution using a mathematical model of promoter function. Our feed-forward transcriptional model predicts gene expression patterns directly from enhancer sequence. We used this functional model along with phylogenetics to generate a set of possible ancestral eve stripe 2 sequences for the common ancestors of 1) D. simulans and D. sechellia; 2) D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. sechellia; and 3) D. erecta and D. yakuba. These ancestral sequences were synthesized and resurrected in vivo. Using a combination of quantitative and computational analysis, we find clear support for functional compensation between the binding sites for Bicoid, Giant, and Krüppel over the course of 40-60 My of Drosophila evolution. We show that this compensation is driven by a coupling interaction between Bicoid activation and repression at the anterior and posterior border necessary for proper placement of the anterior stripe 2 border. A multiplicity of mechanisms for binding site turnover exemplified by Bicoid, Giant, and Krüppel sites, explains how rapid sequence change may occur while maintaining the function of the cis-regulatory element.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.