Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24408399›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2014

Blood culture isolates in neonatal sepsis and their sensitivity in Anand District of India.

Dipen Patel, Archana Nimbalkar, Ankur Sethi, Amit Kungwani, Somashekhar Nimbalkar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dipen PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, Pramukh Swami Medical College and Shree Krishna Hospital, Karamsad, Gujarat, 388325, India.
Archana Nimbalkar
Ankur Sethi
Amit Kungwani
Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Shree Krishna Hospital · INNarayana Health · INPramukhswami Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study prevalent organisms in neonatal sepsis, their sensitivity to antibiotics and outcome in neonates with culture proven sepsis.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of hospital records of 4 y. From 276 culture positive reports of 226 newborns, organisms, their sensitivity to different antibiotics were studied and their outcome was compared to 571 culture negative newborns. Growth detection was done by BacT/ALERT®PF system.

resultsMost common isolates were Klebsiella (42.4 %), Coagulase-negative staphylococci (11.2 %), Enterobacter (9.4 %), Escherichia coli (9.1 %), Pseudomonas (5.4 %) and Acinetobacter (4.7 %). Gram negative organisms were predominant both in early-onset and late-onset neonatal sepsis as well as in inborn and outborn newborns and most of them were resistant to commonly used first line antibiotics like ampicillin, gentamicin and cephalosporins. Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase producing Klebsiella and Escherichia coli were 94.87 % and 92 %, respectively. Methicillin resistant Staphylococci were 33 %. Vancomycin resistance among the Enterococci was 20 %. Most effective first line antibiotic combinations were amikacin with levofloxacin and amikacin with piperacillin-tazobactam. Survival in culture positive newborns (43.36 %, 95 % CI 37.07 to 49.88) was poor than culture negative newborns (53.06 %, 95 % CI 48.96 to 57.12).

conclusionsGram negative organisms were most common cause of neonatal sepsis and were resistant to first line antibiotics. Blood culture positive newborns had poor outcome than culture negative newborns.

Indexed as

BloodHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesSepsis

Identifiers

PMID24408399
OpenAlexW1977618091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.