ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2014
Blood culture isolates in neonatal sepsis and their sensitivity in Anand District of India.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contemporary Trends in Global Mortality of Sepsis Among Young Infants Less Than 90 Days: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Gram-negative neonatal sepsis in low- and lower-middle-income countries and WHO empirical antibiotic recommendations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Relationship between antibiotic consumption pattern and antibiotic resistance in neonatal sepsis.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2023Article
- Extended-spectrum β-lactamase & carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli in neonates from a tertiary care centre in Dibrugarh, Assam, India.The Indian journal of medical research · 2018Article
- Isolation of MRSA, ESBL and AmpC - β -lactamases from Neonatal Sepsis at a Tertiary Care Hospital.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2014Article
- Changing trend in bacterial etiology and antibiotic resistance in sepsis of intramural neonates at a tertiary care hospital.Journal of postgraduate medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo study prevalent organisms in neonatal sepsis, their sensitivity to antibiotics and outcome in neonates with culture proven sepsis.
methodsThis was a retrospective study of hospital records of 4 y. From 276 culture positive reports of 226 newborns, organisms, their sensitivity to different antibiotics were studied and their outcome was compared to 571 culture negative newborns. Growth detection was done by BacT/ALERT®PF system.
resultsMost common isolates were Klebsiella (42.4 %), Coagulase-negative staphylococci (11.2 %), Enterobacter (9.4 %), Escherichia coli (9.1 %), Pseudomonas (5.4 %) and Acinetobacter (4.7 %). Gram negative organisms were predominant both in early-onset and late-onset neonatal sepsis as well as in inborn and outborn newborns and most of them were resistant to commonly used first line antibiotics like ampicillin, gentamicin and cephalosporins. Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase producing Klebsiella and Escherichia coli were 94.87 % and 92 %, respectively. Methicillin resistant Staphylococci were 33 %. Vancomycin resistance among the Enterococci was 20 %. Most effective first line antibiotic combinations were amikacin with levofloxacin and amikacin with piperacillin-tazobactam. Survival in culture positive newborns (43.36 %, 95 % CI 37.07 to 49.88) was poor than culture negative newborns (53.06 %, 95 % CI 48.96 to 57.12).
conclusionsGram negative organisms were most common cause of neonatal sepsis and were resistant to first line antibiotics. Blood culture positive newborns had poor outcome than culture negative newborns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.