Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24408129›Full record

ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2014

Drought stress responses in crops.

Arun K Shanker, M Maheswari, S K Yadav, S Desai, Divya Bhanu, Neha Bajaj Attal, B Venkateswarlu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrative Techniques for Hybrid Breeding inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Morphological and Physio-Chemical Responses to PEG-Induced Water Stress inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arun K ShankerDivision of Crop Sciences, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA), Santoshnagar, Saidabad P.O, Hyderabad, 500-059, India, arunshank@gmail.com.
M Maheswari
S K Yadav
S Desai
Divya Bhanu
Neha Bajaj Attal
B Venkateswarlu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the effects of impending climate change, drought will have a profound impact on crop productivity in the future. Response to drought stress has been studied widely, and the model plant Arabidopsis has guided the studies on crop plants with genome sequence information viz., rice, wheat, maize and sorghum. Since the value of functions of genes, dynamics of pathways and interaction of networks for drought tolerance in plants can only be judged by evidence from field performance, this mini-review provides a research update focussing on the current developments on the response to drought in crop plants. Studies in Arabidopsis provide the basis for interpreting the available information in a systems biology perspective. In particular, the elucidation of the mechanism of drought stress response in crops is considered from evidence-based outputs emerging from recent omic studies in crops.

Indexed as

DroughtsAbscisic AcidArabidopsisCrops, AgriculturalEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, PlantHistonesMetabolomeOryzaProteomeRNA InterferenceSignal TransductionSorghumStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeZea maysAbscisic AcidHistonesProteome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.