Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24407790›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2014

Coupled pot and lysimeter experiments assessing plant performance in microbially assisted phytoremediation.

Andrei Nicoară, Aurora Neagoe, Paula Stancu, Giovanni de Giudici, Francesca Langella, Anna Rosa Sprocati, Virgil Iordache, Erika Kothe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Plant-bacteria partnerships for the remediation of persistent organic pollutants.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Article
  3. Hartig' net formation of Tricholoma vaccinum-spruce ectomycorrhiza in hydroponic cultures.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrei NicoarăResearch Centre for Ecological Services (CESEC), Spl. Independentei 91-92, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Aurora Neagoe
Paula Stancu
Giovanni de Giudici
Francesca Langella
Anna Rosa Sprocati
Virgil Iordache
Erika Kothe
University of Bucharest · ROFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DENational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · ITUniversity of Cagliari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed an experiment at pot scale to assess the effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on the development of five plant species grown on a tailing dam substrate. None of the species even germinated on inoculated unamended tailing material, prompting use of compost amendment. The effect of inoculation on the amended material was to increase soil respiration, and promote elements immobilisation at plant root surface. This was associated with a decrease in the concentrations of elements in the leaching water and an increase of plant biomass, statistically significant in the case of two species: Agrostis capillaris and Festuca rubra. The experiment was repeated at lysimeter scale with the species showing the best development at pot scale, A. capillaris, and the significant total biomass increase as a result of inoculation was confirmed. The patterns of element distribution in plants also changed (the concentrations of metals in the roots of A. capillaris and F. rubra significantly decreased in inoculated treatments, while phosphorus concentration significantly increased in roots of A. capillaris in inoculated treatment at lysimeter scale). Measured variables for plant oxidative stress did not change after inoculations. There were differences of A. capillaris plant-soil system response between experimental scales as a result of different substrate column structure and plant age at the sampling moment. Soil respiration was significantly larger at lysimeter scale than at pot scale. Leachate concentrations of As, Mn and Ni had significantly larger concentrations at lysimeter scale than at pot scale, while Zn concentrations were significantly smaller. Concentrations of several metals were significantly smaller in A. capillaris at lysimeter scale than at pot scale. From an applied perspective, a system A. capillaris-compost-PGPB selected from the rhizosphere of the tailing dam native plants can be an option for the phytostabilisation of tailing dams. Results should be confirmed by investigation at field plot scale.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalBacteriaBiomassDNA PrimersMetals, HeavyMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMiningPhosphorusPlant RootsPoaceaeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRomaniaSequence Analysis, DNASoilSoil PollutantsSpectrometry, X-Ray EmissionDNA PrimersMetals, HeavyPhosphorusRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil PollutantsWaste Products

Identifiers

PMID24407790
OpenAlexW1997438594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.