ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2014
Converging indications of aldosterone antagonists (spironolactone and eplerenone): a narrative review of safety profiles.
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2016Pooled it
- Comparison of two mineralcorticosteroids receptor antagonists for the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy.International ophthalmology · 2017Trial
- Safety of Eplerenone for Kidney-Transplant Recipients with Impaired Renal Function and Receiving Cyclosporine A.PloS one · 2016Trial
- Cardiovascular Effects, Phytochemistry, Drug Interactions, and Safety Profile ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Efficacy of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists on Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Umbrella Review.Kidney medicine · 2025Article
- Ongoing Clinical Trials for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) Afflicted Infertility in Women: A Narrative Review.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2025Review
- Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Oxidative Stress. Natural Treatments.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Effectiveness and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure patients with and without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024Review
- The role of a novel mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone, in chronic kidney disease: mechanisms and clinical advances.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2024Review
- Potential Pharmacokinetic Interactions of Common Cardiovascular Drugs and Selected European and Latin American Herbal Medicines: A Scoping Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Low-dose spironolactone ameliorates adipose tissue inflammation and apoptosis in letrozole-induced PCOS rat model.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Article
- Beneficial Extracardiac Effects of Cardiovascular Medications.Current cardiology reviews · 2022Review
- An unmet medical need vs. regulatory recommendations: how should we treat patients with hyperaldosteronism and advanced chronic kidney disease when surgery is not feasible?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Signaling as a Therapeutic Target for Renal and Cardiac Fibrosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Review
- Should All Patients with Resistant Hypertension Receive Spironolactone?Current hypertension reports · 2016Review
- Use of Diuretics is not associated with mortality in patients admitted to the emergency department: results from a cross-sectional study.Journal of negative results in biomedicine · 2016Article
- Third-generation Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists: Why Do We Need a Fourth?Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2016Review
- Suppression of Rapidly Progressive Mouse Glomerulonephritis with the Non-Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist BR-4628.PloS one · 2015Article
- Cost-effectiveness of Eplerenone in treatment of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of IranArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The converging clinical effectiveness of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) Spironolactone and Eplerenone has made their safety profiles/cost-effectiveness key determinants of "agents of choice" across a broad range of clinical indications. The clinical biology of the aldosterone molecule and its range of effects in varied organ systems have been well elucidated from recent mechanistic and systematic studies. Clinical experience with Spironolactone is well established, as is its adverse effects profile. The range of adverse effects experienced with Spironolactone subsequently led to its modification and synthesis of Eplerenone. Recent published reports have confirmed lower prevalence rates of sex-related adverse effects attributable to Eplerenone compared to Spironolactone. There is, however, not much to choose between these agents in regards to other adverse effects including hyperkalemia and kidney failure. As was the experience with Spironolactone, as more robust observational data on Eplerenone accrues, it is possible that the real-life experience of its adverse profile may be discordant with that reported by randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). In addition, its metabolism by the vulnerable and highly polymorphic cytochrome dependent pathway also makes it susceptible to various drug interactions. The potential implication of the latter (including morbidity and mortality) may take years to evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.