Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24407422›Full record

ArticleCell research2014

Structural analysis of asparaginyl endopeptidase reveals the activation mechanism and a reversible intermediate maturation stage.

Lixia Zhao, Tian Hua, Christopher Crowley, Heng Ru, Xiangmin Ni, Neil Shaw, Lianying Jiao, Wei Ding, Lu Qu, Li-Wei Hung and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Roles of C/EBPβ/AEP in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Murine Models of Secondary Cytokine Storm Syndromes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The Mammalian Cysteine Protease Legumain in Health and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lixia Zhao1] National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China [2] iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Tian HuaNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Christopher CrowleyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Heng RuNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Xiangmin NiNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Neil ShawNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Lianying JiaoNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Wei DingNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Lu QuNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Li-Wei HungPhysics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Wei HuangiHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Lei LiuKey Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry & Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Keqiang YeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Songying OuyangNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Genhong ChengDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Zhi-Jie Liu1] National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China [2] iHuman Institute, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghaiTech University · CNUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USEmory University · USInstitute of Biophysics · CNLos Alamos National Laboratory · USTsinghua University · CN

Funding

Viral Mediated Type I Interferon InductionR01AI069120 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHENG, GENHONG · 2006 to 2021
$6.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asparaginyl endopeptidase (AEP) is an endo/lysosomal cysteine endopeptidase with a preference for an asparagine residue at the P1 site and plays an important role in the maturation of toll-like receptors 3/7/9. AEP is known to undergo autoproteolytic maturation at acidic pH for catalytic activation. Here, we describe crystal structures of the AEP proenzyme and the mature forms of AEP. Structural comparisons between AEP and caspases revealed similarities in the composition of key residues and in the catalytic mechanism. Mutagenesis studies identified N44, R46, H150, E189, C191, S217/S218 and D233 as residues that are essential for the cleavage of the peptide substrate. During maturation, autoproteolytic cleavage of AEP's cap domain opens up access to the active site on the core domain. Unexpectedly, an intermediate autoproteolytic maturation stage was discovered at approximately pH 4.5 in which the partially activated AEP could be reversed back to its proenzyme form. This unique feature was confirmed by the crystal structure of AEPpH4.5 (AEP was matured at pH 4.5 and crystallized at pH 8.5), in which the broken peptide bonds were religated and the structure was transformed back to its proenzyme form. Additionally, the AEP inhibitor cystatin C could be digested by the fully activated AEP, but could not be digested by activated cathepsins. Thus, we demonstrate for the first time that cystatins may regulate the activity of AEP through substrate competition for the active site.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAsparaginyl EndopeptidaseBinding SitesCatalytic DomainCathepsinsCrystallography, X-RayCystatin CCysteine EndopeptidasesEnzyme PrecursorsHEK293 CellsHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMiceMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular Sequence DataAsparaginyl EndopeptidaseCathepsinsCystatin CCysteine EndopeptidasesEnzyme Precursors

Identifiers

PMID24407422
PMCPMC3945893
OpenAlexW2011301103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.