Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24407271›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2014

Choice of diffusion tensor estimation approach affects fiber tractography of the fornix in preterm brain.

A Plaisier, K Pieterman, M H Lequin, P Govaert, A M Heemskerk, I K M Reiss, G P Krestin, A Leemans, J Dudink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Temporal complexity of the BOLD-signal in preterm versus term infants.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Brain-wide structural and functional disruption in mice with oligodendrocyte-specificProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A PlaisierFrom the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (A.P., K.P., P.G., A.M.H., J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartments of Radiology (A.P., M.H.L., A.M.H., G.P.K., J.D.).
K PietermanFrom the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (A.P., K.P., P.G., A.M.H., J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M H LequinDepartments of Radiology (A.P., M.H.L., A.M.H., G.P.K., J.D.).
P GovaertFrom the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (A.P., K.P., P.G., A.M.H., J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Pediatrics (P.G.), Koningin Paola Children's Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
A M HeemskerkFrom the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (A.P., K.P., P.G., A.M.H., J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartments of Radiology (A.P., M.H.L., A.M.H., G.P.K., J.D.).
I K M ReissNeonatology (I.K.M.R.), Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
G P KrestinDepartments of Radiology (A.P., M.H.L., A.M.H., G.P.K., J.D.).
A LeemansImage Sciences Institute (A.L.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J DudinkFrom the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (A.P., K.P., P.G., A.M.H., J.D.), Erasmus Medical Center-Sophia, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartments of Radiology (A.P., M.H.L., A.M.H., G.P.K., J.D.) j.dudink@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeNeonatal DTI enables quantitative assessment of microstructural brain properties. Although its use is increasing, it is not widely known that vast differences in tractography results can occur, depending on the diffusion tensor estimation methodology used. Current clinical work appears to be insufficiently focused on data quality and processing of neonatal DTI. To raise awareness about this important processing step, we investigated tractography reconstructions of the fornix with the use of several estimation techniques. We hypothesized that the method of tensor estimation significantly affects DTI tractography results. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-eight DTI scans of infants born <29 weeks of gestation, acquired at 30-week postmenstrual age and without intracranial injury observed, were prospectively collected. Four diffusion tensor estimation methods were applied: 1) linear least squares; 2) weighted linear least squares; 3) nonlinear least squares, and 4) robust estimation of tensors by outlier rejection. Quality of DTI data and tractography results were evaluated for each method.

resultsWith nonlinear least squares and robust estimation of tensors by outlier rejection, significantly lower mean fractional anisotropy values were obtained than with linear least squares and weighted linear least squares. Visualized quality of tract reconstruction was significantly higher by use of robust estimation of tensors by outlier rejection and correlated with quality of DTI data.

conclusionsQuality assessment and choice of processing methodology have considerable impact on neonatal DTI analysis. Dedicated acquisition, quality assessment, and advanced processing of neonatal DTI data must be ensured before performing clinical analyses, such as associating microstructural brain properties with patient outcome.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAlgorithmsDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleFornix, BrainHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedInfant, PrematureMaleNerve Fibers, MyelinatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24407271
PMCPMC7965135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.