Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24407268›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2014

Do young patients have different clinical presentation of colorectal cancer causing delay in diagnosis?

João Batista de Sousa, Caio Simões Souza, Maria Bianca Fernandes, Leonardo de Castro Durães, Romulo Medeiros de Almeida, Antônio Carlos Nóbrega Dos Santos, Eduardo Freitas da Silva, Paulo Gonçalves de Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Expression of VISTA on T cells in patients with cancer colon.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Young colorectal cancer patients often present too late.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

João Batista de SousaColoproctology Service, Hospital Universitário de Brasília, Universidade de Brasília, Center of Surgical Clinics, SGAN-Av. L2 Norte 604/605, Asa Norte, CEP: 70840-901, Brasília, DF, Brazil, sousajb@unb.br.
Caio Simões Souza
Maria Bianca Fernandes
Leonardo de Castro Durães
Romulo Medeiros de Almeida
Antônio Carlos Nóbrega Dos Santos
Eduardo Freitas da Silva
Paulo Gonçalves de Oliveira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing among young patients. In these patients, colorectal cancer is believed to have a poorer prognosis because it is more aggressive and diagnosed at later stages; however, the behavior of these tumors in young patients remains to be elucidated. We investigated the impact of time interval between onset of symptoms and diagnosis (TISD) at the pathologic stage of colorectal cancer in young patients.

methodsThe medical records of 215 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to age. The young group (age < 50 years) consisted of 66 patients, and the older group (age ≥ 50 years) of 149 patients. Clinical variables, TISD, pathologic stage, operative mortality, and oncologic outcomes were compared between groups.

resultsThe older group had less abdominal pain (74.0 vs. 56.0 %, p = 0.0129). In multivariate analysis, the following variables were independently associated with tumor pathologic stage: personal history of inflammatory bowel disease (p < 0.0001), family history of familial adenomatous polyposis (p = 0.00100), and smoking (p = 0.0070). Both groups had similar rates regarding pathologic stage (I, 15 vs. 22 %; II, 22 vs. 24 %; III, 27 vs. 16 %; IV, 37 vs. 38 %, p = 0.3380). There was no difference in overall survival [45 (69 %) vs. 84 (61 %), p = 0.2482] and cancer-free survival [36 (63 %) vs. 83 (62 %), p = 0.9218] between groups.

conclusionsYoung patients with colorectal cancer had clinical and pathological presentation similar to that of older patients.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisAbdominal PainAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAge FactorsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRisk FactorsWeight Loss

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.