Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24406799›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2014

Higher levels of spontaneous breathing induce lung recruitment and reduce global stress/strain in experimental lung injury.

Andreas Güldner, Anja Braune, Nadja Carvalho, Alessandro Beda, Stefan Zeidler, Bärbel Wiedemann, Gerd Wunderlich, Michael Andreeff, Christopher Uhlig, Peter M Spieth and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03201263 (PRessure suppOrT vEntilation + Sigh in aCuTe hypoxemIc respiratOry Failure patieNts), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03201263 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

PRessure suppOrT vEntilation + Sigh in aCuTe hypoxemIc respiratOry Failure patieNts (PROTECTION): a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoRan2017 to 2019Enrolled258ConditionsRespiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Ventilator LungArmsSigh, Standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas GüldnerFrom the Pulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (A.G., A.B., N.C., A.B., S.Z., C.U., P.M.S., T.K., and M.G.d.A.); Department of Electric Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil (A.B.); Institute of Informatics and Biometry, Dresden, Germany (B.W.); Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (G.W., M.A., and J.K.); and IRCCS San Martino Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy (P.P.).
Anja Braune
Nadja Carvalho
Alessandro Beda
Stefan Zeidler
Bärbel Wiedemann
Gerd Wunderlich
Michael Andreeff
Christopher Uhlig
Peter M Spieth
Thea Koch
Paolo Pelosi
Jörg Kotzerke
Marcelo Gama de Abreu
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRTU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous breathing (SB) in the early phase of the acute respiratory distress syndrome is controversial. Biphasic positive airway pressure/airway pressure release ventilation (BIPAP/APRV) is commonly used, but the level of SB necessary to maximize potential beneficial effects is unknown.

methodsExperimental acute respiratory distress syndrome was induced by saline lung lavage in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs (n = 12). By using a Latin square and crossover design, animals were ventilated with BIPAP/APRV at four different levels of SB in total minute ventilation (60 min each): (1) 0% (BIPAP/APRV0%); (2) greater than 0 to 30% (BIPAP/APRV>0-30%); (3) greater than 30 to 60% (BIPAP/APRV>30-60%); and (4) greater than 60% (BIPAP/APRV>60%). Gas exchange, hemodynamics, and respiratory variables were measured. Lung aeration was assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. The distribution of perfusion was marked with Ga-labeled microspheres and evaluated by positron emission tomography.

resultsThe authors found that higher levels of SB during BIPAP/APRV (1) improved oxygenation; (2) decreased mean transpulmonary pressure (stress) despite increased inspiratory effort; (3) reduced nonaerated lung tissue, with minimal changes in the distribution of perfusion, resulting in decreased low aeration/perfusion zones; and (4) decreased global strain (mean ± SD) (BIPAP/APRV0%: 1.39 ± 0.08; BIPAP/APRV0-30%: 1.33 ± 0.03; BIPAP/APRV30-60%: 1.27 ± 0.06; BIPAP/APRV>60%: 1.25 ± 0.04, P < 0.05 all vs. BIPAP/APRV0%, and BIPAP/APRV>60% vs. BIPAP/APRV0-30%).

conclusionsIn a saline lung lavage model of experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome in pigs, levels of SB during BIPAP/APRV higher than currently recommended for clinical practice, that is, 10 to 30%, improve oxygenation by increasing aeration in dependent lung zones without relevant redistribution of perfusion. In presence of lung recruitment, higher levels of SB reduce global stress and strain despite an increase in inspiratory effort.

Indexed as

RespirationAnimalsCross-Over StudiesDisease Models, AnimalLungLung InjuryPositron-Emission TomographyRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory MechanicsSwineTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID24406799
OpenAlexW2079087658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.