Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24406423›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2014

Is oral chemotherapy prescription safe for patients? A cross-sectional survey.

A Bourmaud, C Pacaut, A Melis, F Tinquaut, N Magné, Y Merrouche, F Chauvin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perceptions of oncology healthcare professional providing care to older adults prescribed oral anticancer medications in the United States: A qualitative study.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Practical strategies to manage cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Saudi Oncology Pharmacy Assembly Experts recommendations.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. The relationship between patient activation, confidence to self-manage side effects, and adherence to oral oncolytics: a pilot study with Michigan oncology practices.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
  6. Cautiously using natural medicine to treat liver problems.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Oral chemotherapy prescription safety practices in Europe.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A BourmaudDepartment of Public Health, Hygée Centre, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institut, Saint Priest en Jarez.
C Pacaut
A Melis
F Tinquaut
N Magné
Y Merrouche
F Chauvin
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRInstitute Cancer De La Loire Lucien Neuwirth · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral chemotherapies are increasingly prescribed. Yet wide variations in prescription practices and in monitoring of toxicity have been underlined despite existing guidelines. There is little recent information available as regard to these practices. We aimed to obtain exhaustive information on oral chemotherapy prescription practices and safety monitoring in French hospitals.

methodsA cross-sectional multicentre survey was carried out to collect information on drug prescription, administration and surveillance: prescribing practices, coordination and monitoring of adherence, safety monitoring and side-effects occurrence prevention. Participants were a large sample of the French oncologists prescribing oral chemotherapy (20%).

resultsOne hundred and fifty-seven oncologists from 112 hospitals (public, comprehensive cancer centres and private) replied (23.7% of cancer hospitals). The majority (56.1%) of the prescriptions were hand-written on a blank sheet. Eighty-four physicians (53.5%) included dose information and 36 (23%) declared having no monitoring procedures for adherence. Only 84 responders (54%) provided education material at first prescription of oral chemotherapy in way to limit avoidable side-effects. Sixty-one (39%) responders stated that they recalled at least one serious adverse event in the previous year declared in their centre.

conclusionsIn this 2012 study, the majority of prescribers followed no standards in prescription writing, safety monitoring and toxicity prevention. The implementation of the international recommendations for oral chemotherapy administration should be considered as a top priority-for both prescribers and health authorities-as regards to the dynamic of development of these molecules and their potential side-effects.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCancer Care FacilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesDrug PrescriptionsHumansMedication AdherenceNeoplasmsPatient Education as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective StudiesQuality Assurance, Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAntineoplastic Agentseducation of patientoral chemotherapypatient adherenceprescription practicessafety monitoringside-effects prevention

Identifiers

PMID24406423
OpenAlexW2127686225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.