Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24406336›Full record

ArticleFly2014

Hedgehog and extramacrochaetae in the Drosophila eye: an irresistible force meets an immovable object.

Carrie M Spratford, Justin P Kumar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fly, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The fly eye: Through the looking glass.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carrie M SpratfordDepartment of Biology; Indiana University; Bloomington, IN USA.
Justin P KumarDepartment of Biology; Indiana University; Bloomington, IN USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

TRAINING IN GENETICST32GM007757 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KUMAR, JUSTIN P · 1985 to 2014
$8.1M
Repression of Non-Ocular Fates by the SIX and EYA Genes During Specification and Patterning of the RetinaR01EY014863 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KUMAR, JUSTIN P · 2003 to 2017
$4.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014863NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the third and final larval instar stage, thousands of pluripotent cells within the Drosophila eye imaginal disc are transformed into a near perfect neurocrystalline lattice of 800 unit eyes called ommatidia. This transformation begins with the initiation of the morphogenetic furrow at the posterior margin of the eye field. The furrow, which marks the leading edge of a wave of differentiation, passes across the epithelium transforming unpatterned and undifferentiated cells into rows of periodically spaced clusters of photoreceptor neurons. As cells enter and exit the furrow they undergo dramatic alterations in cellular architecture and gene expression, many of which are required to propel the furrow forward and for proper cell fate specification. The Decapentaplegic (Dpp) and Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathways are required for the initiation and progression of the furrow, respectively. Consistent with a role in furrow progression, the loss of Hh pathway activity results in a "furrow stop" phenotype. In contrast, reductions in levels of the helix-loop-helix transcription factor, Extramacrochaetae (Emc), lead to the polar opposite phenotype--the furrow accelerates. Recently, we demonstrated that the furrow stop and furrow acceleration phenotypes are molecularly connected. Emc appears to serve as a brake on the furrow by dampening the activity of the Hh pathway. Loss of Emc leads to an upsurge in Hh pathway activity and a faster moving furrow. The acceleration of the furrow appears to be due to an increase in levels of the full-length isoform of Cubitus Interruptus (Ci (155)) and Suppressor of Fused [Su(fu)]. Here we will briefly review the mechanisms by which Hh drives and Emc impedes the progression of the furrow across the developing retina.

Indexed as

AnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell CycleCompound Eye, ArthropodDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHedgehog ProteinsRepressor ProteinsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsDrosophila Proteinsemc protein, DrosophilaHedgehog ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSu(fu) protein, DrosophilaDrosophilaextramacrochaetaeHedgehogmorphogenetic furrowSuppressor of Fused

Identifiers

PMID24406336
PMCPMC3974893
OpenAlexW2062056885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.