Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24406261›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Influenza detection from emergency department reports using natural language processing and Bayesian network classifiers.

Ye Ye, Fuchiang Rich Tsui, Michael Wagner, Jeremy U Espino, Qi Li

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Using natural language processing in emergency medicine health service research: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection and Prevention of Virus Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Automated Analysis of Public Health Laboratory Test Results.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ye YeReal-time Outbreak and Disease Surveillance Laboratory (RODS), Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fuchiang Rich TsuiReal-time Outbreak and Disease Surveillance Laboratory (RODS), Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael WagnerReal-time Outbreak and Disease Surveillance Laboratory (RODS), Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeremy U EspinoReal-time Outbreak and Disease Surveillance Laboratory (RODS), Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Qi LiDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Pharmacovigilence using Natural Language Processing, Statistics, and the EHRR01LM010016 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FRIEDMAN, CAROL · 2009 to 2016
$3.4M
A Biomedical Natural Language Processing ResourceR01LM008635 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FRIEDMAN, CAROL · 2005 to 2008
$2.1M
Probabilistic Disease SurveillanceR01LM011370 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WAGNER, MICHAEL MATTHEW · 2013 to 2015
$1.7M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM008635NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010016NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011370NLM NIH HHS R01LM011370-01A1PHITPO CDC HHS P01 HK000086PHITPO CDC HHS P01-HK000086PHITPO CDC HHS U38 HK000063PHITPO CDC HHS U38HK000063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate factors affecting performance of influenza detection, including accuracy of natural language processing (NLP), discriminative ability of Bayesian network (BN) classifiers, and feature selection.

methodsWe derived a testing dataset of 124 influenza patients and 87 non-influenza (shigellosis) patients. To assess NLP finding-extraction performance, we measured the overall accuracy, recall, and precision of Topaz and MedLEE parsers for 31 influenza-related findings against a reference standard established by three physician reviewers. To elucidate the relative contribution of NLP and BN classifier to classification performance, we compared the discriminative ability of nine combinations of finding-extraction methods (expert, Topaz, and MedLEE) and classifiers (one human-parameterized BN and two machine-parameterized BNs). To assess the effects of feature selection, we conducted secondary analyses of discriminative ability using the most influential findings defined by their likelihood ratios.

resultsThe overall accuracy of Topaz was significantly better than MedLEE (with post-processing) (0.78 vs 0.71, p<0.0001). Classifiers using human-annotated findings were superior to classifiers using Topaz/MedLEE-extracted findings (average area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC): 0.75 vs 0.68, p=0.0113), and machine-parameterized classifiers were superior to the human-parameterized classifier (average AUROC: 0.73 vs 0.66, p=0.0059). The classifiers using the 17 'most influential' findings were more accurate than classifiers using all 31 subject-matter expert-identified findings (average AUROC: 0.76>0.70, p<0.05).

conclusionsUsing a three-component evaluation method we demonstrated how one could elucidate the relative contributions of components under an integrated framework. To improve classification performance, this study encourages researchers to improve NLP accuracy, use a machine-parameterized classifier, and apply feature selection methods.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremEmergency Service, HospitalInfluenza, HumanNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsDysentery, BacillaryElectronic Health RecordsHumansInformation Storage and Retrieval

Identifiers

PMID24406261
PMCPMC4147621
OpenAlexW2152579687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.