Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24405846›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2014

Growing pains and pleasures: how emotional learning guides development.

Eric E Nelson, Jennifer Y F Lau, Johanna M Jarcho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Unique infant neurobiology produces distinctive trauma processing.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The neurobiology of the emotional adolescent: From the inside out.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric E NelsonSection on Development and Affective Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda MD, USA. Electronic address: nelsone@mail.nih.gov.
Jennifer Y F LauDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
Johanna M JarchoSection on Development and Affective Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda MD, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nervous system promotes adaptive responding to myriad environmental stimuli by ascribing emotion to specific stimulus domains. This affects the salience of different stimuli, facilitates learning, and likely involves the amygdala. Recent studies suggest a strong homology between adaptive responses that result from learning and those that emerge during development. As in motivated learning, developmental studies have found the salience of different classes of stimulus (e.g., peers) undergoes marked fluctuation across maturation and may involve differential amygdala engagement. In this review, by highlighting the importance of particular stimulus categories during sensitive periods of development, we suggest that variability in amygdala response to different stimulus domains has an active and functional role in shaping emerging cortical circuits across development.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsBrainCritical Period, PsychologicalEmotionsHumansLearningNeural Pathwaysamygdalacortexsensitive periodssocial

Identifiers

PMID24405846
PMCPMC4219354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.