Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24405366›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2014

Current concepts and progress in RSV vaccine development.

Aleks K Guvenel, Christopher Chiu, Peter Jm Openshaw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. PreliminaryCells · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Respiratory nanoparticle-based vaccines and challenges associated with animal models and translation.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Review
  20. Protein Crystallography in Vaccine Research and Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aleks K GuvenelCentre for Respiratory Infection, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, W2 1PG , UK.
Christopher Chiu
Peter Jm Openshaw

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0902266Medical Research Council G1000758Medical Research Council MC_G1001212Wellcome Trust 071381Wellcome Trust 090382Wellcome Trust 25092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children and debilitated adults and remains one of the major global unmet challenges for vaccine development. Several immunological issues have delayed the development of vaccines, especially the poorly protective response to natural infection and the enhancement of disease following administration of formalin inactivated vaccines during trials conducted in the 1960s. Advances in knowledge of the immune system, of the virus and its antigenic properties combined with new vaccine technologies are now injecting new hope into the field and have given rise to many promising vaccine approaches. Some of these may be optimal for use in children, while others may be more appropriate for pregnant women or vulnerable older adults. With a multi-pronged approach to prevention, we propose that it may be possible to destabilise community circulation of RSV and thus to significantly lessen the impact of RSV disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsAntigens, ViralBronchiolitisCattleChildChild, PreschoolDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMicePan troglodytesPregnancyRatsRespiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanAntigens, ViralRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID24405366
PMCPMC7612829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.