ArticleBiochemistry2014
Biochemical characterization and comparison of two closely related active mariner transposases.
Article in Biochemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- mariner elements as a model for analyzing the stress response and somatic mobilization activity of transposable elements.Heredity · 2025Review
- Optimization of Transposon Mutagenesis Methods inMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- An Engineered Cas-Transposon System for Programmable and Site-Directed DNA Transpositions.The CRISPR journal · 2019Article
- Rigidity and flexibility characteristics of DD[E/D]-transposases Mos1 and Sleeping Beauty.Proteins · 2019Article
- Use of mariner transposases for one-step delivery and integration of DNA in prokaryotes and eukaryotes by transfection.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Article
- Structural Basis for the Inverted Repeat Preferences of mariner Transposases.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
- Structural role of the flanking DNA in mariner transposon excision.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Prokaryotic expression and purification of soluble goldfish Tgf2 transposase with transposition activity.Molecular biotechnology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most DNA transposons move from one genomic location to another by a cut-and-paste mechanism and are useful tools for genomic manipulations. Short inverted repeat (IR) DNA sequences marking each end of the transposon are recognized by a DNA transposase (encoded by the transposon itself). This enzyme cleaves the transposon ends and integrates them at a new genomic location. We report here a comparison of the biophysical and biochemical properties of two closely related and active mariner/Tc1 family DNA transposases: Mboumar-9 and Mos1. We compared the in vitro cleavage activities of the enzymes on their own IR sequences, as well as cross-recognition of their inverted repeat sequences. We found that, like Mos1, untagged recombinant Mboumar-9 transposase is a dimer and forms a stable complex with inverted repeat DNA in the presence of Mg(2+) ions. Mboumar-9 transposase cleaves its inverted repeat DNA in the manner observed for Mos1 transposase. There was minimal cross-recognition of IR sequences between Mos1 and Mboumar-9 transposases, despite these enzymes having 68% identical amino acid sequences. Transposases sharing common biophysical and biochemical properties, but retaining recognition specificity toward their own IR, are a promising platform for the design of chimeric transposases with predicted and improved sequence recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.