ArticleBiomicrofluidics2013
Single cell rheometry with a microfluidic constriction: Quantitative control of friction and fluid leaks between cell and channel walls.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leukocyte transmigration and longitudinal forward-thrusting force in a microfluidic Transwell device.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Amoeboid Swimming Is Propelled by Molecular Paddling in Lymphocytes.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Review
- Mechanical adaptation of monocytes in model lung capillary networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- High-throughput microfluidic micropipette aspiration device to probe time-scale dependent nuclear mechanics in intact cells.Lab on a chip · 2019Article
- Visco-Node-Pore Sensing: A Microfluidic Rheology Platform to Characterize Viscoelastic Properties of Epithelial Cells.iScience · 2019Article
- Flow-Induced Transport of Tumor Cells in a Microfluidic Capillary Network: Role of Friction and Repeated Deformation.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2017Article
- Microfluidic Iterative Mechanical Characteristics (iMECH) Analyzer for Single-Cell Metastatic Identification.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2017Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Optical Stretcher for Cell Mechanical Characterization at Single-Cell Level.Micromachines · 2016Review
- A comprehensive strategy for the analysis of acoustic compressibility and optical deformability on single cells.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- The leukocyte-stiffening property of plasma in early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) revealed by a microfluidic single-cell study: the role of cytokines and protection with antibodies.Critical care (London, England) · 2016Article
- Colloquium: Mechanical formalisms for tissue dynamics.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2015Article
- Force transmission during adhesion-independent migration.Nature cell biology · 2015Article
- Interplay of physical mechanisms and biofilm processes: review of microfluidic methods.Lab on a chip · 2015Review
- Bubble-free and pulse-free fluid delivery into microfluidic devices.Biomicrofluidics · 2014Article
- Influence of hydrodynamics on the growth kinetics of glass-adhering Pseudomonas putida cells through a parallel plate flow chamber.Biomicrofluidics · 2013Article
- Simulation of malaria-infected red blood cells in microfluidic channels: Passage and blockage.Biomicrofluidics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report how cell rheology measurements can be performed by monitoring the deformation of a cell in a microfluidic constriction, provided that friction and fluid leaks effects between the cell and the walls of the microchannels are correctly taken into account. Indeed, the mismatch between the rounded shapes of cells and the angular cross-section of standard microfluidic channels hampers efficient obstruction of the channel by an incoming cell. Moreover, friction forces between a cell and channels walls have never been characterized. Both effects impede a quantitative determination of forces experienced by cells in a constriction. Our study is based on a new microfluidic device composed of two successive constrictions, combined with optical interference microscopy measurements to characterize the contact zone between the cell and the walls of the channel. A cell squeezed in a first constriction obstructs most of the channel cross-section, which strongly limits leaks around cells. The rheological properties of the cell are subsequently probed during its entry in a second narrower constriction. The pressure force is determined from the pressure drop across the device, the cell velocity, and the width of the gutters formed between the cell and the corners of the channel. The additional friction force, which has never been analyzed for moving and constrained cells before, is found to involve both hydrodynamic lubrication and surface forces. This friction results in the existence of a threshold for moving the cells and leads to a non-linear behavior at low velocity. The friction force can nevertheless be assessed in the linear regime. Finally, an apparent viscosity of single cells can be estimated from a numerical prediction of the viscous dissipation induced by a small step in the channel. A preliminary application of our method yields an apparent loss modulus on the order of 100 Pa s for leukocytes THP-1 cells, in agreement with the literature data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.