ArticleBiomicrofluidics2013
A pillar-based microfilter for isolation of white blood cells on elastomeric substrate.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidics-based cell recognition through optimizing suspended cell staining techniques and artificial intelligence.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- An Open-Type Crossflow Microfluidic Chip for Deformable Droplet Separation Driven by a Centrifugal Field.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Recent Advances of PDMS In Vitro Biomodels for Flow Visualizations and Measurements: From Macro to Nanoscale Applications.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Label-free separation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from whole blood by gradient acoustic focusing.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Recent advances in microfluidic cell separation to enable centrifugation-free, low extracorporeal volume leukapheresis in pediatric patients.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2023Review
- Nanoporous membrane fabrication by nanoimprint lithography for nanoparticle sieving.Nanoscale advances · 2022Article
- Review
- High-Throughput White Blood Cell (Leukocyte) Enrichment from Whole Blood Using Hydrodynamic and Inertial Forces.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Flow induced particle separation and collection through linear array pillar microfluidics device.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- Sorting of Particles Using Inertial Focusing and Laminar Vortex Technology: A Review.Micromachines · 2019Review
- Tumor cell capture patterns around aptamer-immobilized microposts in microfluidic devices.Biomicrofluidics · 2017Article
- Deformability based Cell Sorting using Microfluidic Ratchets Enabling Phenotypic Separation of Leukocytes Directly from Whole Blood.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- High-throughput and clogging-free microfluidic filtration platform for on-chip cell separation from undiluted whole blood.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
- Enhancement of microfluidic particle separation using cross-flow filters with hydrodynamic focusing.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
- Tunable Microfluidic Devices for Hydrodynamic Fractionation of Cells and Beads: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Exploiting the oxygen inhibitory effect on UV curing in microfabrication: a modified lithography technique.PloS one · 2015Article
- Viscoelasticity of blood and viscoelastic blood analogues for use in polydymethylsiloxane in vitro models of the circulatory system.Biomicrofluidics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our goal is to design, fabricate, and characterize a pillar-based microfluidic device for size-based separation of human blood cells on an elastomeric substrate with application in the low-cost rapid prototyping of lab-chip devices. The single inlet single outlet device is using parallel U-shape arrays of pillars with cutoff size of 5.5 μm for trapping white blood cells (WBCs) in a pillar chamber with internal dead-volume of less than 1.0 μl. The microstructures are designed to limit the elastomeric deformation against fluid pressures. Numerical analysis showed that at maximum pressure loss of 15 kPa which is lower than the device conformal bonding strength, the pillar elastomeric deformation is less than 5% for flow rates of up to 1.0 ml min(-1). Molding technique was employed for device prototyping using polyurethane methacrylate (PUMA) resin and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mold. Characterization of the dual-layer device with beads and blood samples is performed. Tests with blood injection showed that ∼18%-25% of WBCs are trapped and ∼84%-89% of red blood cells (RBCs) are passed at flow rates of 15-50 μl min(-1) with a slight decrease of WBCs trap and improve of the RBCs pass at higher flow rates. Similar results were obtained by separation of mixed microspheres of different size injected at flow rates of up to 400 μl min(-1). Tests with blood samples stained by fluorescent gel demonstrated that the WBCs are accumulated in the arrays of pillars that later end up to blockage of the device. Filtration results of using elastomeric substrate present a good consistency with the trend of separation efficiencies of the similar silicon-based filters.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.