Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24403525›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2014

Performance of a redesigned HIV Selectest enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay optimized to minimize vaccine-induced seropositivity in HIV vaccine trial participants.

Oksana Penezina, Neil X Krueger, Isaac R Rodriguez-Chavez, Michael P Busch, John Hural, Jerome H Kim, Robert J O'Connell, Eric Hunter, Said Aboud, Keith Higgins and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. HIV Diagnostics and Vaccines: It Takes Two to Tango.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Oksana PenezinaImmunetics, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Neil X Krueger
Isaac R Rodriguez-Chavez
Michael P Busch
John Hural
Jerome H Kim
Robert J O'Connell
Eric Hunter
Said Aboud
Keith Higgins
Victor Kovalenko
David Clapham
David Crane
Andrew E Levin
HIV Selectest Study Group
Immunetics (United States) · USArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THBlood Systems Research Institute · USEmory University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USGlobal Solutions for Infectious Diseases · USMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZNational Institutes of Health · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

LOC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068614 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Dan H. Barouch, Lawrence Corey · 2011 to 2026
$1175.6M
Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEVEN Grant DEEKS · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
Virologic Correlates of Heterosexual TransmissionR37AI051231 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HUNTER, ERIC · 2008 to 2017
$9.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268200417175CNIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI051231NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068614NIH HHS P51 OD011132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine-induced seropositivity (VISP) or seroreactivity (VISR), defined as the reaction of antibodies elicited by HIV vaccines with antigens used in HIV diagnostic immunoassays, can result in reactive assay results for vaccinated but uninfected individuals, with subsequent misclassification of their infection status. The eventual licensure of a vaccine will magnify this issue and calls for the development of mitigating solutions in advance. An immunoassay that discriminates between antibodies elicited by vaccine antigens and those elicited by infection has been developed to address this laboratory testing need. The HIV Selectest is based on consensus and clade-specific HIV peptides that are omitted in many HIV vaccine constructs. The assay was redesigned to enhance performance across worldwide clades and to simplify routine use via a standard kit format. The redesigned assay was evaluated with sera from vaccine trial participants, HIV-infected and uninfected individuals, and healthy controls. The HIV Selectest exhibited specificities of 99.5% with sera from uninfected recipients of 6 different HIV vaccines and 100% with sera from normal donors, while detecting HIV-1 infections, including intercurrent infections, with 95 to 100% sensitivity depending on the clade, with the highest sensitivities for clades A and C. HIV Selectest sensitivity decreased in very early seroconversion specimens, which possibly explains the slightly lower sensitivity observed for asymptomatic blood donors than for clinical HIV cases. Thus, the HIV Selectest provides a new laboratory tool for use in vaccine settings to distinguish the immune response to HIV vaccine antigens from that due to true infection.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesClinical Laboratory TechniquesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHumansSensitivity and SpecificityAIDS VaccinesHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID24403525
PMCPMC3957658
OpenAlexW2085291378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.