ArticleDer Radiologe2014
[Current reporting in radiology : what will happen tomorrow?].
Article in Der Radiologe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Incidental findings : Evaluation, management recommendations and legal considerations].Der Radiologe · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueReporting in radiology faces considerable changes in the near future that will be influenced by a broader understanding of the task and increasing technological possibilities. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsUntil now a radiological report could be regarded as a text phrased by a radiologist after viewing imaging data. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: New solutions will be accessed by advances in visualization of large datasets, in extracting, analyzing, and communicating metadata as well as by improved integration and interpretation of clinical information. PERFORMANCE: Virtual reality, texture analysis, growing networks, semantic annotation, data mining and context based presentation have the potential to extensively change the everyday working routine. ACHIEVEMENTS: Although many of these developments are still in a laboratory phase, the impact on the process of reporting can already be predicted. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: As the leading community in information analysis and technology, radiology as a subject should strive to lead and shape these impending changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24402724What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.