Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24402641›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2014

Evaluation of a computer program for non-invasive determination of pulmonary shunt and ventilation-perfusion mismatch.

Geoffrey G Lockwood, Nick L S Fung, J Gareth Jones

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unstable SpOFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Design of liver functional reserve monitor based on three-wavelength from red light to IR.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Geoffrey G LockwoodAnaesthetic Department, Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0HS, UK, g.lockwood@imperial.ac.uk.
Nick L S Fung
J Gareth Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a three-compartment model (shunt and two perfused compartments) to analyse the relationship between inspired oxygen (FIO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) in terms of pulmonary shunt and ventilation-perfusion ratio (VA/Q). The program was tested using 24 exact datasets, each with six pairs of FIO2 and SaO2 data points with known VA/Q and shunt, generated by a complex calculator of gas exchange. Additional datasets were created by adding noise and rounding the exact sets, and by reducing the number of data points per dataset. The importance of the oxyhaemoglobin dissociation curve and the arterio-venous difference in oxygen content (avDO2) were also tested. Analysis using the three compartment model was more accurate than the two compartment model and less affected by data degradation. The absolute error in shunt estimation was never more than 2.2 % for the exact and rounded datasets, but the error in VA/Q estimation was -29 to 19 % of the true value (10th-90th centiles). The characteristics of the well-ventilated compartment were not determined accurately. At extremes of cardiac output, an assumed value of avDO2 resulted in significant errors. It is probably advantageous to correct for foetal haemoglobin in neonatal datasets. Analysis of FIO2 versus SaO2 datasets using a three compartment model provides accurate estimates of shunt and VA/Q when arterio-venous difference in oxygen content is known. The estimates may have value as objective measures of gas exchange, and as a visual guide for oxygen therapy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, CardiovascularBreath TestsComputer SimulationDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansOximetryOxygenOxygen ConsumptionPulmonary ArteryReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySoftware ValidationVentilation-Perfusion RatioOxygen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.