ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2014
Identification and validation of an anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy response assay in breast cancer.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translational study identifies XPF and MUS81 as predictive biomarkers for oxaliplatin-based peri-operative chemotherapy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: the TNT Trial.Nature medicine · 2018Trial
- Article
- Article
- DNA damage response in breast cancer and its significant role in guiding novel precise therapies.Biomarker research · 2024Review
- DNA damage response-related immune activation signature predicts the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors: from gastrointestinal cancer analysis to pan-cancer validation.Cancer biology & medicine · 2023Article
- Association of immune-related expression profile with sensitivity to chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer science · 2023Article
- Integrated Multimodal Analyses of DNA Damage Response and Immune Markers as Predictors of Response in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the TNT Trial (NCT00532727).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Article
- Dual Prognostic Classification of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by DNA Damage Immune Response and Homologous Recombination Deficiency.JCO precision oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- A Clinical Prediction Model for Breast Cancer in Women Having Their First Mammogram.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Activation of a cGAS-STING-mediated immune response predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Pan-cancer analysis reveals homologous recombination deficiency score as a predictive marker for immunotherapy responders.Human cell · 2022Article
- A bespoke target selection tool to guide biomarker discovery in tubo-ovarian cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Race-Specific Genetic Profiles of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Multiple Cancers.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Immunology and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Ovarian Cancer - Current Aspects.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2021Article
- The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2021Article
- A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Chromatin accessibility changes at intergenic regions are associated with ovarian cancer drug resistance.Clinical epigenetics · 2021Article
- Tumor genomic, transcriptomic, and immune profiling characterizes differential response to first-line platinum chemotherapy in high grade serous ovarian cancer.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is no method routinely used to predict response to anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in the clinic; therefore patients often receive treatment for breast cancer with no benefit. Loss of the Fanconi anemia/BRCA (FA/BRCA) DNA damage response (DDR) pathway occurs in approximately 25% of breast cancer patients through several mechanisms and results in sensitization to DNA-damaging agents. The aim of this study was to develop an assay to detect DDR-deficient tumors associated with loss of the FA/BRCA pathway, for the purpose of treatment selection.
methodsDNA microarray data from 21 FA patients and 11 control subjects were analyzed to identify genetic processes associated with a deficiency in DDR. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was then performed using 60 BRCA1/2 mutant and 47 sporadic tumor samples, and a molecular subgroup was identified that was defined by the molecular processes represented within FA patients. A 44-gene microarray-based assay (the DDR deficiency assay) was developed to prospectively identify this subgroup from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples. All statistical tests were two-sided.
resultsIn a publicly available independent cohort of 203 patients, the assay predicted complete pathologic response vs residual disease after neoadjuvant DNA-damaging chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, anthracycline, and cyclophosphamide) with an odds ratio of 3.96 (95% confidence interval [Cl] =1.67 to 9.41; P = .002). In a new independent cohort of 191 breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, a positive assay result predicted 5-year relapse-free survival with a hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% Cl = 0.15 to 0.88; P = .03) compared with the assay negative population.
conclusionsA formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue-based assay has been developed and independently validated as a predictor of response and prognosis after anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. These findings warrant further validation in a prospective clinical study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.