Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24402156›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2013

A conventional polymerase chain reaction-based method for the diagnosis of human schistosomiasis in stool samples from individuals in a low-endemicity area.

Teiliane Rodrigues Carneiro, Regina Helena Saramago Peralta, Marta Cristhiany Cunha Pinheiro, Sara Menezes de Oliveira, José Mauro Peralta, Fernando Schemelzer Moraes Bezerra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Advances in the Diagnosis of Human Schistosomiasis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  11. Evaluation of the sensitivity of IgG and IgM ELISA in detecting Schistosoma mansoni infections in a low endemicity setting.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teiliane Rodrigues CarneiroDepartamento de Patologia e Medicina Legal, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brasil, FortalezaCE.
Regina Helena Saramago PeraltaDepartamento de Patologia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brasil, NiteróiRJ.
Marta Cristhiany Cunha PinheiroDepartamento de Patologia e Medicina Legal, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brasil, FortalezaCE.
Sara Menezes de OliveiraDepartamento de Patologia e Medicina Legal, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brasil, FortalezaCE.
José Mauro PeraltaDepartamento de Imunologia, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Goes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, Rio de JaneiroRJ.
Fernando Schemelzer Moraes BezerraDepartamento de Patologia e Medicina Legal, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brasil, FortalezaCE.
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method to detect Schistosoma mansoni DNA in stool samples from individuals living in a low-endemicity area in Brazil. Of the 125 initial stool samples, 80 were ELISA reactive and eggs were identified in 19 of the samples by parasitological examination. For the PCR evaluations, 56 stool samples were selected and divided into five groups. Groups I-IV were scored negative for S. mansoni eggs by parasitological examination. Groups I and II were ELISA reactive, whereas Groups III and IV were ELISA nonreactive. Groups II and III were positive for other intestinal parasites. PCR testing scored eight samples as positive from these four groups. Group V represented the S. mansoni -positive group and it included ELISA-reactive samples that were scored positive for S. mansoni by one or more parasitological examinations (6/19 were positive by Kato-Katz method, 9/17 by saline gradient and 10/13 by Helmintex®). PCR scored 13 of these 19 samples as positive for S. mansoni . We conclude that while none of these methods yielded 100% sensitivity, a combination of techniques should be effective for improving the detection of S. mansoni infection in low-endemicity areas.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsBrazilChildChild, PreschoolDNA, HelminthFecesHumansMiddle AgedParasite Egg CountPolymerase Chain ReactionSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasis mansoniSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID24402156
PMCPMC4005555
OpenAlexW2110218840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.