Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24401334›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2014

Evidence for eIF2α phosphorylation-independent effects of GSK2656157, a novel catalytic inhibitor of PERK with clinical implications.

Jothilatha Krishnamoorthy, Kamindla Rajesh, Farzaneh Mirzajani, Polixenia Kesoglidou, Andreas I Papadakis, Antonis E Koromilas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Activation of PERK Elicits Memory Impairment through Inactivation of CREB and Downregulation of PSD95 After Traumatic Brain Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jothilatha KrishnamoorthyLady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University; Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital; Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Kamindla RajeshLady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University; Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital; Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Farzaneh MirzajaniLady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University; Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital; Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Polixenia KesoglidouLady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University; Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital; Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Andreas I PapadakisLady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University; Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital; Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Antonis E KoromilasLady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University; Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital; Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Oncology; Faculty of Medicine; McGill University; Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University · CAJewish General Hospital · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident protein kinase PERK is a major component of the unfolded protein response (UPR), which promotes the adaptation of cells to various forms of stress. PERK phosphorylates the α subunit of the translation initiation factor eIF2 at serine 51, a modification that plays a key role in the regulation of mRNA translation in stressed cells. Several studies have demonstrated that the PERK-eIF2α phosphorylation pathway maintains insulin biosynthesis and glucose homeostasis, facilitates tumor formation and decreases the efficacy of tumor treatment with chemotherapeutic drugs. Recently, a selective catalytic PERK inhibitor termed GSK2656157 has been developed with anti-tumor properties in mice. Herein, we provide evidence that inhibition of PERK activity by GSK2656157 does not always correlate with inhibition of eIF2α phosphorylation. Also, GSK2656157 does not always mimic the biological effects of the genetic inactivation of PERK. Furthermore, cells treated with GSK2656157 increase eIF2α phosphorylation as a means to compensate for the loss of PERK. Using human tumor cells impaired in eIF2α phosphorylation, we demonstrate that GSK2656157 induces ER stress-mediated death suggesting that the drug acts independent of the inhibition of eIF2α phosphorylation. We conclude that GSK2656157 might be a useful compound to dissect pathways that compensate for the loss of PERK and/or identify PERK pathways that are independent of eIF2α phosphorylation.

Indexed as

AdenineAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell DeathCell LineeIF-2 KinaseEndoplasmic Reticulum StressEukaryotic Initiation Factor-2HumansIndolesMicePhosphorylationProtein Kinase InhibitorsAdenineAntineoplastic AgentseIF-2 KinaseEukaryotic Initiation Factor-2GSK2656157IndolesProtein Kinase Inhibitorsendoplasmic reticulum stressmRNA translationPERK/PEK kinasepharmacological inhibitorsprotein phosphorylationtranslation initiation factor eIF2tumorigenesisunfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID24401334
PMCPMC3979916
OpenAlexW2043291230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.