Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24401288›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2014

Engaging pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU participatory action research project (PICU-PAR).

Jean-Paul Collet, Peter W Skippen, Mir Kaber Mosavianpour, Alexander Pitfield, Bubli Chakraborty, Garth Hunte, Ronald Lindstrom, Niranjan Kissoon, William H McKellin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. New approach to assessing and addressing moral distress in intensive care unit personnel: a case study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The culture of research communication in neonatal intensive care units: key stakeholder perspectives.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jean-Paul Collet
Peter W Skippen
Mir Kaber Mosavianpour
Alexander Pitfield
Bubli Chakraborty
Garth Hunte
Ronald Lindstrom
Niranjan Kissoon
William H McKellinDepartment of Anthropology, University of British Columbia, 6303 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC, Canada. mcke@mail.ubc.ca.
BC Children's Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAProvincial Health Services Authority · CARoyal Roads University · CASt. Paul's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite considerable efforts, engaging staff to lead quality improvement activities in practice settings is a persistent challenge. At British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH), the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) undertook a new phase of quality improvement actions based on the Community of Practice (CoP) model with Participatory Action Research (PAR). This approach aims to mobilize the PICU 'community' as a whole with a focus on practice; namely, to create a 'community of practice' to support reflection, learning, and innovation in everyday work. METHODOLOGY: An iterative two-stage PAR process using mixed methods has been developed among the PICU CoP to describe the environment (stage 1) and implement specific interventions (stage 2). Stage 1 is ethnographic description of the unit's care practice. Surveys, interviews, focus groups, and direct observations describe the clinical staff's experiences and perspectives around bedside care and quality endeavors in the PICU. Contrasts and comparisons across participants, time and activities help understanding the PICU culture and experience. Stage 2 is a succession of PAR spirals, using results from phase 1 to set up specific interventions aimed at building the staff's capability to conduct QI projects while acquiring appropriate technical skills and leadership capacity (primary outcome). Team communication, information, and interaction will be enhanced through a knowledge exchange (KE) and a wireless network of iPADs. RELEVANCE: Lack of leadership at the staff level in order to improve daily practice is a recognized challenge that faces many hospitals. We believe that the PAR approach within a highly motivated CoP is a sound method to create the social dynamic and cultural context within which clinical teams can grow, reflect, innovate and feel proud to better serve patients.

Indexed as

Personnel, HospitalCommunicationEnvironmentHealth Services ResearchHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricLeadershipOrganizational CultureQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID24401288
PMCPMC3896821
OpenAlexW2092133598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.