Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24401140›Full record

ArticleJournal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A2014

Videoendoscopic single-port nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

Mustafa Tukenmez, Burcu Celet Ozden, Orhan Agcaoglu, Mustafa Kecer, Vahit Ozmen, Mahmut Muslumanoglu, Abdullah Igci

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03838549 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Pre Pectoral Implant for Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Single Port Endoscopy in Prophylactic Indication

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2019 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsGenetic Predisposition, Breast CancerArmsProphylactic mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction
NCT04037852 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Robotic Versus Conventional or Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy in the Management of Breast Cancer- A Prospective Registry Case Control Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorChanghua Christian HospitalRan2019 to 2022Enrolled180ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArmsrobotic assisted nipple sparing mastectomy, Endoscopic assisted nipple sparing mastectomy, Conventional nipple sparing mastectomy
NCT04049305 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Robotic Versus Conventional or Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy in the Management of Breast Cancer- A Retrospective Study With Multi-center Pooled Data Analysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorChanghua Christian HospitalRan2019 to 2021Enrolled900ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArmsRobotic assisted nipple sparing mastectomy (R-NSM), conventional nipple sparing mastectomy (C-NSM), Endoscopic assisted nipple sparing mastectomy (E-NSM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Current surgical practices of robotic-assisted tissue repair and reconstruction.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Robotic-Assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mustafa Tukenmez1 Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University , Istanbul, Turkey .
Burcu Celet Ozden
Orhan Agcaoglu
Mustafa Kecer
Vahit Ozmen
Mahmut Muslumanoglu
Abdullah Igci
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSingle-incision videoendoscopic surgery has recently become popular as a result of the ongoing search for less invasive procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic single-port nipple-sparing mastectomy, axillary lymphadenectomy, and immediate reconstruction in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom May 14, 2012 through January 23, 2013, 10 patients underwent videoendoscopic single-port nipple-sparing mastectomy and axillary dissection via a single, limited incision and immediate prosthetic reconstruction. Patient charts were reviewed, and demographic data, operative time, complications and pathology results were analyzed.

resultsIn all patients, videoendoscopic surgery was performed successfully. Of 10 patients, 7 were diagnosed as having invasive ductal carcinoma, 2 had a ductal carcinoma in situ, and 1 underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. The weight of the resected gland was 300-650 g, with a mean of 420 g. There were no operative complications, and the mean operative time was 250 minutes (range, 160-330 minutes). One-stage reconstruction with implants was performed on 4 patients, whereas expanders were placed in the remaining 6. Surgical margins of all cases were pathologically negative, and there were no recurrences observed during the early follow-up period.

conclusionsVideoendoscopic single-port nipple-sparing mastectomy is technically feasible even in larger breasts, enabling immediate reconstruction with good cosmetic outcomes. However, further studies with larger clinical series and long-term follow-up are required to compare the safety and efficacy of the technique with those of the standard nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Indexed as

AdultAxillaBreast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, DuctalCarcinoma in SituEndoscopyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymph Node ExcisionMammaplastyMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID24401140
PMCPMC3935461
OpenAlexW1778602875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.