Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2014
A randomized trial of hyperglycemic control in pediatric intensive care.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02574156 (Control of Hyperglycemia After Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Control of Hyperglycemia After Cardiac Surgery: CHyCS Trial
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 240 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early versus late parenteral nutrition for critically ill term and late preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children.Intensive care medicine · 2020Guideline
- Tight glycemic control in critically ill pediatric patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Pediatric research · 2018Pooled it
- Tight glycemic control in critically ill pediatric patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Pediatric research · 2018Pooled it
- Tight glycemic control in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2018Pooled it
- A phase II dose evaluation pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of cholecalciferol in critically ill children with vitamin D deficiency (VITdAL-PICU study).BMC pediatrics · 2023Trial
- Long-Term Neurobehavioral and Quality of Life Outcomes of Critically Ill Children after Glycemic Control.The Journal of pediatrics · 2020Trial
- Tight Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Children.The New England journal of medicine · 2017Trial
- Design and rationale of Heart and Lung Failure - Pediatric INsulin Titration Trial (HALF-PINT): A randomized clinical trial of tight glycemic control in hyperglycemic critically ill children.Contemporary clinical trials · 2017Trial
- Glucose Control in Severely Burned Patients Using Metformin: An Interim Safety and Efficacy Analysis of a Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of surgery · 2016Trial
- Impact of Tight Glycemic Control on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 1 Year of Age for Children with Congenital Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.The Journal of pediatrics · 2016Trial
- Tight Glycemic Control With Insulin Does Not Affect Skeletal Muscle Degradation During the Early Postoperative Period Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2015Trial
- Severe and multiple hypoglycemic episodes are associated with increased risk of death in ICU patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2015Trial
- Individualising blood glucose control in ICU patients: evidence and practical implementations.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Diabetes Management Strategies in Intensive Care Settings.The Medical clinics of North America · 2026Review
- The invisible emergencies: metabolic and neuro-critical disorders often missed in the pediatric ED - a narrative review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.Journal of intensive care · 2025Article
- On how to feed critically ill children in intensive care: A slowly shifting paradigm.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Review
- Glucometrics utilisation in an urban teaching hospital in ireland: current practice and future aims.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Neonatal dysglycemia: a review of dysglycemia in relation to brain health and neurodevelopmental outcomes.Pediatric research · 2024Review
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhether an insulin infusion should be used for tight control of hyperglycemia in critically ill children remains unclear.
methodsWe randomly assigned children (≤16 years of age) who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) and were expected to require mechanical ventilation and vasoactive drugs for at least 12 hours to either tight glycemic control, with a target blood glucose range of 72 to 126 mg per deciliter (4.0 to 7.0 mmol per liter), or conventional glycemic control, with a target level below 216 mg per deciliter (12.0 mmol per liter). The primary outcome was the number of days alive and free from mechanical ventilation at 30 days after randomization. The main prespecified subgroup analysis compared children who had undergone cardiac surgery with those who had not. We also assessed costs of hospital and community health services.
resultsA total of 1369 patients at 13 centers in England underwent randomization: 694 to tight glycemic control and 675 to conventional glycemic control; 60% had undergone cardiac surgery. The mean between-group difference in the number of days alive and free from mechanical ventilation at 30 days was 0.36 days (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.42 to 1.14); the effects did not differ according to subgroup. Severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose, <36 mg per deciliter [2.0 mmol per liter]) occurred in a higher proportion of children in the tight-glycemic-control group than in the conventional-glycemic-control group (7.3% vs. 1.5%, P<0.001). Overall, the mean 12-month costs were lower in the tight-glycemic-control group than in the conventional-glycemic-control group. The mean 12-month costs were similar in the two groups in the cardiac-surgery subgroup, but in the subgroup that had not undergone cardiac surgery, the mean cost was significantly lower in the tight-glycemic-control group than in the conventional-glycemic-control group: -$13,120 (95% CI, -$24,682 to -$1,559).
conclusionsThis multicenter, randomized trial showed that tight glycemic control in critically ill children had no significant effect on major clinical outcomes, although the incidence of hypoglycemia was higher with tight glucose control than with conventional glucose control. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment Program, U.K. National Health Service; CHiP Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN61735247.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.