Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24400999›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2014

Diagnosis, prevalence estimation and burden measurement in population surveys of headache: presenting the HARDSHIP questionnaire.

Timothy J Steiner, Gopalakrishna Gururaj, Colette Andrée, Zaza Katsarava, Ilya Ayzenberg, Sheng-Yuan Yu, Mohammed Al Jumah, Redda Tekle-Haimanot, Gretchen L Birbeck, Arif Herekar and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06112587 (Muscle Function and Strength Training of the Neck and Shoulder in Migraine and Tension-type Headache Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 128 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06112587 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Muscle Function and Strength Training of the Neck and Shoulder in Migraine and Tension-type Headache Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanish Headache CenterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsMigraine, Tension-Type Headache, Neck PainArmsstrength training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Methodology of a population-based survey of headache disorders among adults in Latvia.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Timothy J SteinerDepartment of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. t.steiner@imperial.ac.uk.
Gopalakrishna Gururaj
Colette Andrée
Zaza Katsarava
Ilya Ayzenberg
Sheng-Yuan Yu
Mohammed Al Jumah
Redda Tekle-Haimanot
Gretchen L Birbeck
Arif Herekar
Mattias Linde
Edouard Mbewe
Kedar Manandhar
Ajay Risal
Rigmor Jensen
Luiz Paulo Queiroz
Ann I Scher
Shuu-Jiun Wang
Lars Jacob Stovner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global burden of headache is very large, but knowledge of it is far from complete and needs still to be gathered. Published population-based studies have used variable methodology, which has influenced findings and made comparisons difficult. The Global Campaign against Headache is undertaking initiatives to improve and standardize methods in use for cross-sectional studies. One requirement is for a survey instrument with proven cross-cultural validity. This report describes the development of such an instrument. Two of the authors developed the initial version, which was used with adaptations in population-based studies in China, Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Zambia and 10 countries in the European Union. The resultant evolution of this instrument was reviewed by an expert consensus group drawn from all world regions. The final output was the Headache-Attributed Restriction, Disability, Social Handicap and Impaired Participation (HARDSHIP) questionnaire, designed for application by trained lay interviewers. HARDSHIP is a modular instrument incorporating demographic enquiry, diagnostic questions based on ICHD-3 beta criteria, and enquiries into each of the following as components of headache-attributed burden: symptom burden; health-care utilization; disability and productive time losses; impact on education, career and earnings; perception of control; interictal burden; overall individual burden; effects on relationships and family dynamics; effects on others, including household partner and children; quality of life; wellbeing; obesity as a comorbidity. HARDSHIP already has demonstrated validity and acceptability in multiple languages and cultures. Modules may be included or not, and others (e.g., on additional comorbidities) added, according to the purpose of the study and resources (especially time) available.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessPopulation SurveillanceAdultChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaEuropean UnionFemaleHeadacheHealth SurveysHumansIndiaNepalPakistanPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID24400999
PMCPMC3906903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.