Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24400669›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2014

Hospital case volume and outcomes among patients hospitalized with severe sepsis.

Allan J Walkey, Renda Soylemez Wiener

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Updated estimates of sepsis hospitalizations at United States academic medical centers.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Allan J Walkey1 The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine and Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Renda Soylemez Wiener

Funding

Improving decisions about evaluating pulmonary nodules for lung cancerK07CA138772 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI WIENER, RENDA SOYLEMEZ · 2009 to 2013
$860k
Atrial Fibrillation in Sepsis: Patient Outcomes and Provider Practice PatternsK01HL116768 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WALKEY, ALLAN J. · 2013 to 2017
$742k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA138772NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL116768NHLBI NIH HHS K01HL116768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleProcesses of care are potential determinants of outcomes in patients with severe sepsis. Whether hospitals with more experience caring for patients with severe sepsis also have improved outcomes is unclear.

objectivesTo determine associations between hospital severe sepsis caseload and outcomes.

methodsWe analyzed data from U.S. academic hospitals provided through University HealthSystem Consortium. We used University HealthSystem Consortium's sepsis mortality model (c-statistic, 0.826) for risk adjustment. Validated International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification algorithms were used to identify hospital severe sepsis case volume. Associations between risk-adjusted severe sepsis case volume and mortality, length of stay, and costs were analyzed using spline regression and analysis of covariance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsWe identified 56,997 patients with severe sepsis admitted to 124 U.S. academic hospitals during 2011. Hospitals admitted 460 ± 216 patients with severe sepsis, with median length of stay 12.5 days (interquartile range, 11.1-14.2), median direct costs $26,304 (interquartile range, $21,900-$32,090), and average hospital mortality 25.6 ± 5.3%. Higher severe sepsis case volume was associated with lower unadjusted severe sepsis mortality (R2 = 0.10, P = 0.01) and risk-adjusted severe sepsis mortality (R2 = 0.21, P < 0.001). After further adjustment for geographic region, number of beds, and long-term acute care referrals, hospitals in the highest severe sepsis case volume quartile had an absolute 7% (95% confidence interval, 2.4-11.6%) lower hospital mortality than hospitals in the lowest quartile. We did not identify associations between case volume and resource use.

conclusionsAcademic hospitals with higher severe sepsis case volume have lower severe sepsis hospital mortality without higher costs.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersHospital MortalityHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospital CostsHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24400669
PMCPMC3977716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.