Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24400340›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2013

Temporal fate specification and neural progenitor competence during development.

Minoree Kohwi, Chris Q Doe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hormonal control of postmitotic neuronal identity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cell cycle-dependent cues regulate temporal patterning of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. mCell stem cell · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minoree Kohwi
Chris Q Doe

Funding

GENETIC AND MOLECULAR STUDIES OF NEUROGENESISR01HD027056 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Chris Q Doe · 1989 to 2026
$5.0M
Genetic and Molecular Studies of NeurogenesisR37HD027056 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI DOE, CHRIS Q · 2012 to 2021
$3.0M
Mechanisms underlying loss of neural stem cell competence.K99HD072035 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI KOHWI, MINOREE · 2012 to 2013
$221k
NICHD NIH HHS HD072035NICHD NIH HHS HD27056NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD072035NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD027056NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD027056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast diversity of neurons and glia of the CNS is generated from a small, heterogeneous population of progenitors that undergo transcriptional changes during development to sequentially specify distinct cell fates. Guided by cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic cues, invertebrate and mammalian neural progenitors carefully regulate when and how many of each cell type is produced, enabling the formation of functional neural circuits. Emerging evidence indicates that neural progenitors also undergo changes in global chromatin architecture, thereby restricting when a particular cell type can be generated. Studies of temporal-identity specification and progenitor competence can provide insight into how we could use neural progenitors to more effectively generate specific cell types for brain repair.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCentral Nervous SystemNeural Stem CellsNeurogliaNeurons

Identifiers

PMID24400340
PMCPMC3951856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.