Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24400275›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2013

Improving the Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes of Children with Pneumonia: Where are the Gaps?

Anne B Chang, Mong H Ooi, David Perera, Keith Grimwood

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient-reported outcome measures for paediatric acute lower respiratory infection studies.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A review of the role ofPneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Childhood Pneumonia Screener: a concept.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne B ChangQueensland Children's Respiratory Centre, Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, QLD , Australia ; Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University , Darwin, NT , Australia.
Mong H OoiDepartment of Pediatrics, Kuching Hospital , Sarawak , Malaysia.
David PereraInstitute of Health and Community Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak , Kota Samarahan , Malaysia.
Keith GrimwoodQueensland Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia ; Queensland Paediatric Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Royal Children's Hospital , Brisbane, QLD , Australia.
Menzies School of Health Research · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUSarawak General Hospital · MYUniversiti Malaysia Sarawak · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumonia is the greatest contributor to childhood mortality and morbidity in resource-poor regions, while in high-income countries it is one of the most common reasons for clinic attendance and hospitalization in this age group. Furthermore, pneumonia in children increases the risk of developing chronic pulmonary disorders in later adult life. While substantial advances in managing childhood pneumonia have been made, many issues remain, some of which are highlighted in this perspective. Multiple studies are required as many factors that influence outcomes, such as etiology, patient characteristics, and prevention strategies can vary between and within countries and regions. Also, outside of vaccine studies, most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pneumonia have been based in resource-poor countries where the primary aim is usually prevention of mortality. Few RCTs have focused on medium to long-term outcomes or prevention. We propose different tiers of primary outcomes, where in resource-rich countries medium to long-term sequelae should also be included and not just the length of hospitalization and readmission rates.

Indexed as

acute respiratory infectionsdiagnosisoutcomespneumoniatreatment

Identifiers

PMID24400275
PMCPMC3864194
OpenAlexW2155911582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.