Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24400258›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2013

Dendritic cell vaccination in pediatric gliomas: lessons learnt and future perspectives.

Matthias Eyrich, Johannes Rachor, Susanne C Schreiber, Matthias Wölfl, Paul G Schlegel

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. In situ dendritic cell vaccination for the treatment of glioma and literature review.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthias EyrichDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital, University of Würzburg Würzburg, Germany.
Johannes RachorDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital, University of Würzburg Würzburg, Germany.
Susanne C SchreiberDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital, University of Würzburg Würzburg, Germany.
Matthias WölflDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital, University of Würzburg Würzburg, Germany.
Paul G SchlegelDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, University Children's Hospital, University of Würzburg Würzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy of malignant gliomas with autologous dendritic cells (DCs) in addition to surgery and radiochemotherapy has been a focus of intense research during the past decade. Since both children and adults are affected by this highly aggressive brain tumor, 10-15% of the several hundred vaccinated patients represent children, making pediatric glioma patients the largest uniform pediatric vaccination cohort so far. In general, DC vaccination in malignant gliomas has been shown to be safe and several studies with a non-vaccinated control group could clearly demonstrate a survival benefit for the vaccinated patients. Interestingly, children and adolescents below 21 years of age seem to benefit even more than adult patients. This review summarizes the findings of the 25 clinical trials published so far and gives a perspective how DC vaccination could be implemented as part of multimodal therapeutic strategies in the near future.

Indexed as

clinical trialDC vaccinationimmunotherapymalignant gliomapediatrics

Identifiers

PMID24400258
PMCPMC3860891
OpenAlexW2131111082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.